https://github.com/amazon-science/contrastive-controlled-mt

Code and data for the IWSLT 2022 shared task on Formality Control for SLT

https://github.com/amazon-science/contrastive-controlled-mt

Science Score: 39.0%

This score indicates how likely this project is to be science-related based on various indicators:

  • CITATION.cff file
  • codemeta.json file
    Found codemeta.json file
  • .zenodo.json file
    Found .zenodo.json file
  • DOI references
    Found 4 DOI reference(s) in README
  • Academic publication links
  • Academic email domains
  • Institutional organization owner
  • JOSS paper metadata
  • Scientific vocabulary similarity
    Low similarity (10.0%) to scientific vocabulary
Last synced: 9 months ago · JSON representation

Repository

Code and data for the IWSLT 2022 shared task on Formality Control for SLT

Basic Info
  • Host: GitHub
  • Owner: amazon-science
  • License: other
  • Language: Ruby
  • Default Branch: main
  • Homepage:
  • Size: 8.22 MB
Statistics
  • Stars: 21
  • Watchers: 13
  • Forks: 6
  • Open Issues: 2
  • Releases: 4
Created over 4 years ago · Last pushed about 3 years ago
Metadata Files
Readme Contributing License Code of conduct

README.md

CoCoA-MT: A Dataset and Benchmark for Contrastive Controlled MT with Application to Formality

The machine translation (MT) task is typically formulated as that of returning a single translation for an input segment. However, in many cases, multiple different translations are valid and the appropriate translation may depend on the intended target audience, characteristics of the speaker, or even the relationship between speakers. Specific problems arise when dealing with honorifics, particularly translating from English into languages with formality markers. For example, the sentence "Are you sure?" can be translated in German as "Sind Sie sich sicher?" (formal register) or "Bist du dir sicher?" (informal). Using wrong or inconsistent tone may be perceived as inappropriate or jarring for users of certain cultures and demographics. This work addresses the problem of learning to control target language attributes, in this case formality, from a small amount of labeled contrastive data. We introduce an annotated dataset (CoCoA-MT) and an associated evaluation metric for training and evaluating formality-controlled MT models for six diverse target languages.

IWSLT 2022 shared task

Participants to the Formality Control for SLT shared task can find the annotated dataset and evaluation script under IWSLT2022/.

Security

See CONTRIBUTING for more information.

License

This project is licensed under the CDLA-Sharing-1.0 License.

Citation

If you are a participant in the IWSLT shared task on Formality Control for SLT, or are otherwise using the resources from this repository in your work, please cite: @inproceedings{nadejde-etal-2022-coca-mt, title = "{C}o{C}o{A}-{MT}: A Dataset and Benchmark for {Co}ntrastive {Co}ntrolled {MT} with Application to Formality", author = "N\u{a}dejde, Maria and Currey, Anna and Hsu, Benjamin and Niu, Xing and Federico, Marcello and Dinu, Georgiana", booktitle = "Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2022", month = jul, year = "2022", address = "Seattle, USA", publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics", }

If you use the topical-chat part of the dataset, in addition to the citation above, please also cite: @inproceedings{Gopalakrishnan2019, author={Karthik Gopalakrishnan and Behnam Hedayatnia and Qinlang Chen and Anna Gottardi and Sanjeev Kwatra and Anu Venkatesh and Raefer Gabriel and Dilek Hakkani-Tür}, title={{Topical-Chat: Towards Knowledge-Grounded Open-Domain Conversations}}, year=2019, booktitle={Proc. Interspeech 2019}, pages={1891--1895}, doi={10.21437/Interspeech.2019-3079}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2019-3079} }

Owner

  • Name: Amazon Science
  • Login: amazon-science
  • Kind: organization

GitHub Events

Total
Last Year

Issues and Pull Requests

Last synced: over 1 year ago

All Time
  • Total issues: 5
  • Total pull requests: 6
  • Average time to close issues: 5 months
  • Average time to close pull requests: 4 days
  • Total issue authors: 3
  • Total pull request authors: 3
  • Average comments per issue: 1.6
  • Average comments per pull request: 0.33
  • Merged pull requests: 6
  • Bot issues: 0
  • Bot pull requests: 0
Past Year
  • Issues: 0
  • Pull requests: 0
  • Average time to close issues: N/A
  • Average time to close pull requests: N/A
  • Issue authors: 0
  • Pull request authors: 0
  • Average comments per issue: 0
  • Average comments per pull request: 0
  • Merged pull requests: 0
  • Bot issues: 0
  • Bot pull requests: 0
Top Authors
Issue Authors
  • sweta20 (2)
  • erip (2)
  • st-vincent1 (1)
Pull Request Authors
  • erip (3)
  • sweta20 (1)
  • bhsu22 (1)
Top Labels
Issue Labels
Pull Request Labels