Data

Tools

Indexes

Applications

Experiments

Open Source Science

https://github.com/bienflorencia/rda-sharc-reco

https://github.com/bienflorencia/rda-sharc-reco

Science Score: 49.0%

This score indicates how likely this project is to be science-related based on various indicators:

  • ○
    CITATION.cff file
  • ✓
    codemeta.json file
    Found codemeta.json file
  • ✓
    .zenodo.json file
    Found .zenodo.json file
  • ✓
    DOI references
    Found 3 DOI reference(s) in README
  • ✓
    Academic publication links
    Links to: zenodo.org
  • ○
    Academic email domains
  • ○
    Institutional organization owner
  • ○
    JOSS paper metadata
  • ○
    Scientific vocabulary similarity
    Low similarity (8.8%) to scientific vocabulary
Last synced: 6 months ago · JSON representation

Repository

Basic Info
Statistics
  • Stars: 0
  • Watchers: 1
  • Forks: 0
  • Open Issues: 0
  • Releases: 0
Created almost 3 years ago · Last pushed 8 months ago
Metadata Files
Readme License

README.md

Recommendations on Open Science Rewards and Incentives

Guidance for multiple stakeholders in Research

Laurence Mabile , Hanna Shmagun , Christopher Erdmann , Anne Cambon-Thomsen , Mogens Thomsen , and Florencia Grattarola .

Open Science contributes to the collective building of scientific knowledge and societal progress. However, academic research currently fails to recognise and reward efforts to share research outputs. Yet it is crucial that such activities be valued, as they require considerable time, energy, and expertise to make scientific outputs usable by others, as stated by the FAIR principles. To address this challenge, several bottom-up and top-down initiatives have emerged to explore ways to assess and credit Open Science activities (e.g., Research Data Alliance, RDA) and to promote the assessment of a broad spectrum of research outputs, including datasets and software (e.g., Coalition for Advancement of Research Assessment, CoARA). As part of the RDA-SHARC (SHAring Rewards and Credit) interest group, we have developed a set of recommendations to help implement various rewarding schemes at different levels. The recommendations target a broad range of stakeholders. For instance, institutions are encouraged to provide digital services and infrastructure, organise training and cover expenses associated with making data available for the community. Funders should establish policies requiring open access to data produced by funded research and provide corresponding support. Publishers should favour open peer-review models and open access to articles, data and software. Government policymakers should set up a comprehensive Open Science strategy, as recommended by UNESCO and followed by a growing number of countries. The present work details different measures that are proposed to the stakeholders. The need to include sharing activities in research evaluation schemes as an overarching mechanism to promote Open Science practices is specifically emphasised.

Keywords: Open Science, Open Access, FAIR, rewards, sharing, research evaluation

This page is built with ❤️ and Quarto, using Pakillo's template https://github.com/Pakillo/quarto-course-website-template

Owner

  • Name: Florencia Grattarola
  • Login: bienflorencia
  • Kind: user
  • Location: Uruguay | Czech Republic
  • Company: Biodiversidata | ČZU

Biodiversity Informatics | Macroecology | Community Science | Open Science. For export del Uruguay.

GitHub Events

Total
  • Push event: 40
Last Year
  • Push event: 40