Science Score: 44.0%

This score indicates how likely this project is to be science-related based on various indicators:

  • CITATION.cff file
    Found CITATION.cff file
  • codemeta.json file
    Found codemeta.json file
  • .zenodo.json file
    Found .zenodo.json file
  • DOI references
  • Academic publication links
  • Academic email domains
  • Institutional organization owner
  • JOSS paper metadata
  • Scientific vocabulary similarity
    Low similarity (9.0%) to scientific vocabulary
Last synced: 6 months ago · JSON representation ·

Repository

Basic Info
Statistics
  • Stars: 45
  • Watchers: 4
  • Forks: 9
  • Open Issues: 0
  • Releases: 0
Created about 8 years ago · Last pushed about 1 year ago
Metadata Files
Readme Citation

Readme.md

Research Methods in Computer Science

This repository contains the material I have used for a 2 hour bootcamp on research methods in CS. I have conducted this session twice (August 2018 at IIT Gandhinagar and July 2017 at IIIT Delhi). Here is the video recording for the IIT Gandhinagar instantiation. You can also find a VideoKen version of the video here, which includes phrase cloud, table of contents and more.

Contents

I took four exercise and example driven sessions on:

  1. Writing better emails: I took an example driven approach of writing good emails. I showed some poor and some good emails that I have written. We discussed a few fundamental characteristics of a good email. We did three hands-on exercise for writing e-mail to: i) potential advisor, ii) reporting results to advisor, iii) seeking help on a research project from someone outside the institute.

  2. Towards better paper abstracts: I discussed the general structuring of research papers. We took case study on the constitution of a good paper abstract. We looked at potential scientific flaws that can be seen from the abstract itself. We did a few hands-on exercises.

  3. Thinking like a scientist: This session was a continuation of the previous one. We discussed the scientific method with the help of a trivial example. We did a few hands-on exercises where the students were asked to present hypothesis, observation, and experimental design for few problems.

  4. Debugging like a pro: This was also an example driven session. We looked at StackOverflow questions and understood the characteristics of good questions. These good questions have a much higher chance of being debugged correctly in quick time.

Feedback

The average feedback was approximately 9/10. Some of the subjective comments are as follows:

"The presentations were excellent. The hard work on making these slides was clearly visible. Also, the way the sessions were presented in the class was good."

"Dr. Nipun Batra had given a good talk. I would like to thank him for giving his valuable time and for sharing lots of experiences which will help us a lot."

"Relating with Real-World examples was the best part of the presentation."

Owner

  • Name: Nipun Batra
  • Login: nipunbatra
  • Kind: user
  • Location: Gandhinagar
  • Company: IIT Gandhinagar

CS Assistant Professor at IIT Gandhinagar

Citation (CITATION.cff)

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this material, please cite it as below."
title: "Research Methods in Computer Science"
authors:
  - family-names: "Batra"
    given-names: "Nipun"
    orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0736-7169"
date-released: 2018-08-01
version: "1.0.0"
url: "https://nipunbatra.github.io/CS-Research-Methods-Bootcamp/"
repository-code: "https://github.com/nipunbatra/CS-Research-Methods-Bootcamp"
abstract: >
  This repository contains material from a 2-hour bootcamp on research methods in Computer Science. The sessions covered email writing, paper abstracts, 
  scientific thinking, and debugging.

GitHub Events

Total
  • Watch event: 24
  • Push event: 9
  • Fork event: 6
  • Create event: 1
Last Year
  • Watch event: 24
  • Push event: 9
  • Fork event: 6
  • Create event: 1

Issues and Pull Requests

Last synced: about 1 year ago

All Time
  • Total issues: 0
  • Total pull requests: 0
  • Average time to close issues: N/A
  • Average time to close pull requests: N/A
  • Total issue authors: 0
  • Total pull request authors: 0
  • Average comments per issue: 0
  • Average comments per pull request: 0
  • Merged pull requests: 0
  • Bot issues: 0
  • Bot pull requests: 0
Past Year
  • Issues: 0
  • Pull requests: 0
  • Average time to close issues: N/A
  • Average time to close pull requests: N/A
  • Issue authors: 0
  • Pull request authors: 0
  • Average comments per issue: 0
  • Average comments per pull request: 0
  • Merged pull requests: 0
  • Bot issues: 0
  • Bot pull requests: 0
Top Authors
Issue Authors
Pull Request Authors
Top Labels
Issue Labels
Pull Request Labels

Dependencies

.github/workflows/static.yml actions
  • actions/checkout v4 composite
  • actions/configure-pages v5 composite
  • actions/deploy-pages v4 composite
  • actions/upload-pages-artifact v3 composite