Science Score: 36.0%
This score indicates how likely this project is to be science-related based on various indicators:
-
â—‹CITATION.cff file
-
✓codemeta.json file
Found codemeta.json file -
✓.zenodo.json file
Found .zenodo.json file -
â—‹DOI references
-
✓Academic publication links
Links to: arxiv.org -
â—‹Committers with academic emails
-
â—‹Institutional organization owner
-
â—‹JOSS paper metadata
-
â—‹Scientific vocabulary similarity
Low similarity (12.5%) to scientific vocabulary
Keywords
Keywords from Contributors
Repository
🧮 Bayesian networks in Python
Basic Info
- Host: GitHub
- Owner: MaxHalford
- License: mit
- Language: Python
- Default Branch: master
- Homepage: https://sorobn.streamlit.app
- Size: 550 KB
Statistics
- Stars: 253
- Watchers: 7
- Forks: 36
- Open Issues: 5
- Releases: 0
Topics
Metadata Files
README.md

This is an unambitious Python library for working with Bayesian networks. For serious usage, you should probably be using a more established project, such as pomegranate, pgmpy, bnlearn (which is built on the latter), or even PyMC. There's also the well-documented bnlearn package in R. Hey, you could even go medieval and use something like Netica I'm just jesting, they actually have a nice tutorial on Bayesian networks. By the way, if you're not familiar with Bayesian networks, then I highly recommend Patrick Winston's MIT courses on probabilistic inference (part 1, part 2).
The main goal of this project is to be used for educational purposes. As such, more emphasis is put on tidyness and conciseness than on performance. I find libraries such as pomegranate are wonderful. But, they literally contain several thousand lines of non-obvious code, at the detriment of simplicity and ease of comprehension. I've also put some effort into designing a slick API that makes full use of pandas. Although performance is not the main focus of this library, it is reasonably efficient and should be able to satisfy most use cases in a timely manner.
Table of contents
Installation
You should be able to install and use this library with any Python version above 3.9:
sh
pip install sorobn
Note that under the hood, sorobn uses vose for random sampling, which is written in Cython.
Usage
Manual structures
The central construct in sorobn is the BayesNet class. A Bayesian network's structure can be manually defined by instantiating a BayesNet. As an example, let's use Judea Pearl's famous alarm network:
```python
import sorobn as hh
bn = hh.BayesNet( ... ('Burglary', 'Alarm'), ... ('Earthquake', 'Alarm'), ... ('Alarm', 'John calls'), ... ('Alarm', 'Mary calls'), ... seed=42, ... )
```
You may also use the following notation, which is slightly more terse:
```python
import sorobn as hh
bn = hh.BayesNet( ... (['Burglary', 'Earthquake'], 'Alarm'), ... ('Alarm', ['John calls', 'Mary calls']), ... seed=42 ... )
```
In Judea Pearl's example, the conditional probability tables are given. Therefore, we can define them manually by setting the values of the P attribute:
```python
import pandas as pd
P(Burglary)
bn.P['Burglary'] = pd.Series({False: .999, True: .001})
P(Earthquake)
bn.P['Earthquake'] = pd.Series({False: .998, True: .002})
P(Alarm | Burglary, Earthquake)
bn.P['Alarm'] = pd.Series({ ... (True, True, True): .95, ... (True, True, False): .05, ... ... (True, False, True): .94, ... (True, False, False): .06, ... ... (False, True, True): .29, ... (False, True, False): .71, ... ... (False, False, True): .001, ... (False, False, False): .999 ... })
P(John calls | Alarm)
bn.P['John calls'] = pd.Series({ ... (True, True): .9, ... (True, False): .1, ... (False, True): .05, ... (False, False): .95 ... })
P(Mary calls | Alarm)
bn.P['Mary calls'] = pd.Series({ ... (True, True): .7, ... (True, False): .3, ... (False, True): .01, ... (False, False): .99 ... })
```
The prepare method has to be called whenever the structure and/or the P are manually specified. This will do some house-keeping and make sure everything is sound. It is not compulsory but highly recommended, just like brushing your teeth.
```python
bn.prepare()
```
Note that you are allowed to specify variables that have no dependencies with any other variable:
```python
_ = hh.BayesNet( ... ('Cloud', 'Rain'), ... (['Rain', 'Cold'], 'Snow'), ... 'Wind speed' # has no dependencies ... )
```
Random sampling
You can use a Bayesian network to generate random samples. The samples will follow the distribution induced by the network's structure and its conditional probability tables.
```python
from pprint import pprint
pprint(bn.sample()) {'Alarm': False, 'Burglary': False, 'Earthquake': False, 'John calls': False, 'Mary calls': False}
bn.sample(5) # doctest: +SKIP Alarm Burglary Earthquake John calls Mary calls 0 False False False False False 1 False False False False False 2 False False False False False 3 False False False False False 4 False False False True False
```
You can also specify starting values for a subset of the variables.
```python
pprint(bn.sample(init={'Alarm': True, 'Burglary': True})) {'Alarm': True, 'Burglary': True, 'Earthquake': False, 'John calls': True, 'Mary calls': False}
```
The supported inference methods are:
forwardfor forward sampling. <!---backwardfor backward sampling.-->
Note that randomness is controlled via the seed parameter, when BayesNet is initialized.
Probabilistic inference
A Bayesian network is a generative model. Therefore, it can be used for many purposes. For instance, it can answer probabilistic queries, such as:
What is the likelihood of there being a burglary if both John and Mary call?
This question can be answered by using the query method, which returns the probability distribution for the possible outcomes. Said otherwise, the query method can be used to look at a query variable's distribution conditioned on a given event. This can be denoted as P(query | event).
```python
bn.query('Burglary', event={'Mary calls': True, 'John calls': True}) Burglary False 0.715828 True 0.284172 Name: P(Burglary), dtype: float64
```
We can also answer questions that involve multiple query variables, for instance:
What are the chances that John and Mary call if an earthquake happens?
```python
bn.query('John calls', 'Mary calls', event={'Earthquake': True}) John calls Mary calls False False 0.675854 True 0.027085 True False 0.113591 True 0.183470 Name: P(John calls, Mary calls), dtype: float64
```
By default, the answer is found via an exact inference procedure. For small networks this isn't very expensive to perform. However, for larger networks, you might want to prefer using approximate inference. The latter is a class of methods that randomly sample the network and return an estimate of the answer. The quality of the estimate increases with the number of iterations that are performed. For instance, you can use Gibbs sampling:
```python
bn.query( ... 'Burglary', ... event={'Mary calls': True, 'John calls': True}, ... algorithm='gibbs', ... n_iterations=1000 ... ) # doctest: +SKIP Burglary False 0.706 True 0.294 Name: P(Burglary), dtype: float64
```
The supported inference methods are:
exactfor variable elimination.gibbsfor Gibbs sampling.likelihoodfor likelihood weighting.rejectionfor rejection sampling.
As with random sampling, randomness is controlled during BayesNet initialization, via the seed parameter.
Missing value imputation
A use case for probabilistic inference is to impute missing values. The impute method fills the missing values with the most likely replacements, given the present information. This is usually more accurate than simply replacing by the mean or the most common value. Additionally, such an approach can be much more efficient than model-based iterative imputation.
```python
sample = { ... 'Alarm': True, ... 'Burglary': True, ... 'Earthquake': False, ... 'John calls': None, # missing ... 'Mary calls': None # missing ... }
sample = bn.impute(sample) pprint(sample) {'Alarm': True, 'Burglary': True, 'Earthquake': False, 'John calls': True, 'Mary calls': True}
```
Note that the impute method can be seen as the equivalent of pomegranate's predict method.
Likelihood estimation
You can estimate the likelihood of an event with the predict_proba method:
```py
event = { ... 'Alarm': False, ... 'Burglary': False, ... 'Earthquake': False, ... 'John calls': False, ... 'Mary calls': False ... }
bn.predict_proba(event) 0.936742...
```
In other words, predict_proba computes P(event), whereas the query method computes P(query | event). You may also estimate the likelihood for a partial event. The probabilities for the unobserved variables will be summed out.
```py
event = {'Alarm': True, 'Burglary': False} bn.predict_proba(event) 0.001576...
```
This also works for an event with a single variable:
```py
event = {'Alarm': False} bn.predict_proba(event) 0.997483...
```
Note that you can also pass a bunch of events to predict_proba, as so:
```py
events = pd.DataFrame([ ... {'Alarm': False, 'Burglary': False, 'Earthquake': False, ... 'John calls': False, 'Mary calls': False}, ... ... {'Alarm': False, 'Burglary': False, 'Earthquake': False, ... 'John calls': True, 'Mary calls': False}, ... ... {'Alarm': True, 'Burglary': True, 'Earthquake': True, ... 'John calls': True, 'Mary calls': True} ... ])
bn.predict_proba(events) Alarm Burglary Earthquake John calls Mary calls False False False False False 0.936743 True False 0.049302 True True True True True 0.000001 Name: P(Alarm, Burglary, Earthquake, John calls, Mary calls), dtype: float64
```
Parameter estimation
You can determine the values of the P from a dataset. This is a straightforward procedure, as it only requires performing a groupby followed by a value_counts for each CPT.
```python
samples = bn.sample(1000) bn = bn.fit(samples)
```
Note that in this case you do not have to call the prepare method because it is done for you implicitly.
If you want to update an already existing Bayesian networks with new observations, then you can use partial_fit:
```python
bn = bn.partialfit(samples[:500]) bn = bn.partialfit(samples[500:])
```
The same result will be obtained whether you use fit once or partial_fit multiple times in succession.
Structure learning
Chow-Liu trees
A Chow-Liu tree is a tree structure that represents a factorised distribution with maximal likelihood. It's essentially the best tree structure that can be found.
```python
samples = hh.examples.asia().sample(300) structure = hh.structure.chow_liu(samples) bn = hh.BayesNet(*structure)
```
Visualization
You can use the graphviz method to obtain a graphviz.Digraph representation.
```python
bn = hh.examples.asia() dot = bn.graphviz() path = dot.render('asia', directory='figures', format='svg', cleanup=True)
```
Note that the graphviz library is not installed by default because it requires a platform dependent binary. Therefore, you have to install it by yourself.
Graphical user interface
A side-goal of this project is to provide a user interface to play around with a given user interface. Fortunately, we live in wonderful times where many powerful and opensource tools are available. At the moment, I have a preference for streamlit.
You can install the GUI dependencies by running the following command:
sh
$ pip install git+https://github.com/MaxHalford/sorobn --install-option="--extras-require=gui"
You can then launch a demo by running the sorobn command:
sh
$ sorobn
This will launch a streamlit interface where you can play around with the examples that sorobn provides. You can see a running instance of it in this Streamlit app.
An obvious next step would be to allow users to run this with their own Bayesian networks. Then again, using streamlit is so easy that you might as well do this yourself.
Support for continuous variables
Bayesian networks that handle both discrete and continuous are said to be hybrid. There are two approaches to deal with continuous variables. The first approach is to use parametric distributions within nodes that pertain to a continuous variable. This has two disadvantages. First, it is complex because there are different cases to handle: a discrete variable conditioned by a continuous one, a continuous variable conditioned by a discrete one, or combinations of the former with the latter. Secondly, such an approach requires having to pick a parametric distribution for each variable. Although there are methods to automate this choice for you, they are expensive and are far from being foolproof.
The second approach is to simply discretize the continuous variables. Although this might seem naive, it is generally a good enough approach and definitely makes things simpler implementation-wise. There are many ways to go about discretising a continuous attribute. For instance, you can apply a quantile-based discretization function. You could also round each number to its closest integer. In some cases you might be able to apply a manual rule. For instance, you can convert a numeric temperature to "cold", "mild", and "hot".
To summarize, we prefer to give the user the flexibility to discretize the variables by herself. Indeed, most of the time the best procedure depends on the problem at hand and cannot be automated adequately.
Toy networks
Several toy networks are available to fool around with in the examples submodule:
-
alarmthe alarm network introduced by Judea Pearl. -
asiaa popular example introduced in Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems. -
gradesan example from Stanford's CS 228 class. -
sprinklerthe network used in chapter 14 of Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (3rd edition).
Here is some example usage:
```python
bn = hh.examples.sprinkler()
bn.nodes ['Cloudy', 'Rain', 'Sprinkler', 'Wet grass']
pprint(bn.parents) {'Rain': ['Cloudy'], 'Sprinkler': ['Cloudy'], 'Wet grass': ['Rain', 'Sprinkler']}
pprint(bn.children) {'Cloudy': ['Rain', 'Sprinkler'], 'Rain': ['Wet grass'], 'Sprinkler': ['Wet grass']}
```
Development
```sh
Download and navigate to the source code
git clone https://github.com/MaxHalford/sorobn cd sorobn
Install poetry
curl -sSL https://install.python-poetry.org | python3 -
Install in development mode
poetry install
Run tests
poetry shell pytest ```
License
This project is free and open-source software licensed under the MIT license.
Owner
- Name: Max Halford
- Login: MaxHalford
- Kind: user
- Location: France
- Company: @carbonfact
- Website: maxhalford.github.io
- Repositories: 87
- Profile: https://github.com/MaxHalford
🌱 Head of Data @carbonfact
GitHub Events
Total
- Watch event: 19
- Push event: 1
- Fork event: 3
Last Year
- Watch event: 19
- Push event: 1
- Fork event: 3
Committers
Last synced: 9 months ago
Top Committers
| Name | Commits | |
|---|---|---|
| Max Halford | m****5@g****m | 117 |
| dependabot[bot] | 4****] | 2 |
Issues and Pull Requests
Last synced: 9 months ago
All Time
- Total issues: 24
- Total pull requests: 9
- Average time to close issues: about 1 month
- Average time to close pull requests: about 1 month
- Total issue authors: 11
- Total pull request authors: 2
- Average comments per issue: 1.04
- Average comments per pull request: 0.44
- Merged pull requests: 2
- Bot issues: 0
- Bot pull requests: 8
Past Year
- Issues: 1
- Pull requests: 0
- Average time to close issues: N/A
- Average time to close pull requests: N/A
- Issue authors: 1
- Pull request authors: 0
- Average comments per issue: 5.0
- Average comments per pull request: 0
- Merged pull requests: 0
- Bot issues: 0
- Bot pull requests: 0
Top Authors
Issue Authors
- MaxHalford (14)
- ngoctnq (1)
- scientistkev (1)
- jaeckdaniel (1)
- SongZhihao616 (1)
- lucamcwood (1)
- Srinidhi2274 (1)
- jaromiru (1)
- George713 (1)
- priamai (1)
- danieljaeck (1)
Pull Request Authors
- dependabot[bot] (10)
- MaxHalford (1)
Top Labels
Issue Labels
Pull Request Labels
Dependencies
- 116 dependencies
- actions/cache v3 composite
- actions/checkout v3 composite
- actions/setup-python v4 composite
- snok/install-poetry v1 composite
- ts-graphviz/setup-graphviz v1 composite
- ./.github/actions/install-env * composite
- actions/checkout v3 composite
- numpy ^1.24.2
- pandas ^1.5.3
- python ^3.9
- vose ^0.0.1