https://github.com/chainsawriot/totervogel

⚰️🐦 Toter Vogel (Dead Bird): A Simple Digital Forensic Tool for Twitter

https://github.com/chainsawriot/totervogel

Science Score: 26.0%

This score indicates how likely this project is to be science-related based on various indicators:

  • CITATION.cff file
  • codemeta.json file
    Found codemeta.json file
  • .zenodo.json file
  • DOI references
    Found 9 DOI reference(s) in README
  • Academic publication links
  • Academic email domains
  • Institutional organization owner
  • JOSS paper metadata
  • Scientific vocabulary similarity
    Low similarity (13.8%) to scientific vocabulary
Last synced: 9 months ago · JSON representation

Repository

⚰️🐦 Toter Vogel (Dead Bird): A Simple Digital Forensic Tool for Twitter

Basic Info
  • Host: GitHub
  • Owner: chainsawriot
  • License: gpl-3.0
  • Language: R
  • Default Branch: master
  • Homepage:
  • Size: 706 KB
Statistics
  • Stars: 6
  • Watchers: 2
  • Forks: 0
  • Open Issues: 2
  • Releases: 0
Archived
Created almost 6 years ago · Last pushed almost 6 years ago
Metadata Files
Readme License

README.Rmd

---
output: github_document
---



```{r, include = FALSE}
knitr::opts_chunk$set(
  collapse = TRUE,
  comment = "#>",
  fig.path = "man/figures/README-",
  out.width = "100%"
)
```

# totervogel 




The goal of totervogel is to detect malicious twitter accounts using Benford's Law.

Please refer to Golbeck (2015) and Golbeck (2019) for more details about the analysis of first significant digits. For the analysis of last significant digits, please refer to Dlugosz & Müller-Funk (2009)

1. Golbeck, J. (2015). Benford’s law applies to online social networks. PloS one, 10(8), e0135169. doi: [10.1371/journal.pone.0135169](https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135169)
2. Golbeck, J. (2019). Benford’s Law can detect malicious social bots. First Monday. doi: [10.5210/fm.v24i8.10163](https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i8.10163)
3. Dlugosz, S., & Müller-Funk, U. (2009). The value of the last digit: Statistical fraud detection with digit analysis. Advances in data analysis and classification, 3(3), 281. doi: [10.1007/s11634-009-0048-5](https://doi.org/10.1007/s11634-009-0048-5)


## Installation

You can install the development version of totervogel from [GitHub](https://github.com/) with:

``` r
# install.packages("devtools")
devtools::install_github("chainsawriot/totervogel")
```

## Example

This is how the totervogel of an organic human account looks like. By default, it analyzes the friends.

```{r myaccount}
library(totervogel)
res <- create_totervogel("scott_althaus")
res
```

```{r plotmyaccount}
plot(res)
```

You can also analyze followers.

```{r followers}
res_fol <- create_totervogel("scott_althaus", followers = TRUE)
res_fol
```

```{r folplot}
plot(res_fol)
```

A potentially malicious twitter account's totervogel results might look like:

(Please don't visit these accounts.)

```{r malicious}
malicious_res <- create_totervogel("badluck_jones")
malicious_res
```


```{r malicious2}
malicious_res2 <- create_totervogel("yoyo13148779", followers = TRUE)
malicious_res2
```

```{r plotmalicious2, echo = TRUE}
plot(malicious_res2)
```

# Notes

* In Golbeck (2015), 89.7% of Twitter users had a correction of over 0.9. Less than 1% had a correlation under 0.5. An account must be very suspicious to have such a low correction.

* Accounts with a lower friends count are more likely to be detected with lower Benfordness.

* The last digit analysis is experimental. The results should only raise your eyebrows, if more than one aspect (friends, statuses, followers) displays unexpected distribution.

* The logo of this package is a remix of Kearney et al's  [rtweet](https://github.com/ropensci/rtweet)'s logo. The original logo is licensed under an MIT License.

Owner

  • Login: chainsawriot
  • Kind: user
  • Location: Germany
  • Company: @gesistsa

GitHub Events

Total
Last Year

Issues and Pull Requests

Last synced: over 1 year ago

All Time
  • Total issues: 2
  • Total pull requests: 0
  • Average time to close issues: N/A
  • Average time to close pull requests: N/A
  • Total issue authors: 2
  • Total pull request authors: 0
  • Average comments per issue: 0.5
  • Average comments per pull request: 0
  • Merged pull requests: 0
  • Bot issues: 0
  • Bot pull requests: 0
Past Year
  • Issues: 0
  • Pull requests: 0
  • Average time to close issues: N/A
  • Average time to close pull requests: N/A
  • Issue authors: 0
  • Pull request authors: 0
  • Average comments per issue: 0
  • Average comments per pull request: 0
  • Merged pull requests: 0
  • Bot issues: 0
  • Bot pull requests: 0
Top Authors
Issue Authors
  • gentrexha (1)
  • magnanim-old (1)
Pull Request Authors
Top Labels
Issue Labels
Pull Request Labels