https://github.com/chaoss/wg-risk

Risk Working Group Repository

https://github.com/chaoss/wg-risk

Science Score: 36.0%

This score indicates how likely this project is to be science-related based on various indicators:

  • CITATION.cff file
  • codemeta.json file
    Found codemeta.json file
  • .zenodo.json file
    Found .zenodo.json file
  • DOI references
  • Academic publication links
  • Committers with academic emails
    3 of 25 committers (12.0%) from academic institutions
  • Institutional organization owner
  • JOSS paper metadata
  • Scientific vocabulary similarity
    Low similarity (12.1%) to scientific vocabulary

Keywords from Contributors

diversity-measurement inclusion equity-research equity diversity-in-tech diversity-analysis diversity chaoss sustainability unix
Last synced: 10 months ago · JSON representation

Repository

Risk Working Group Repository

Basic Info
  • Host: GitHub
  • Owner: chaoss
  • License: mit
  • Default Branch: main
  • Homepage:
  • Size: 2.87 MB
Statistics
  • Stars: 27
  • Watchers: 12
  • Forks: 35
  • Open Issues: 25
  • Releases: 5
Created over 7 years ago · Last pushed over 1 year ago
Metadata Files
Readme Contributing Funding License Roadmap

README.md

CHAOSS Risk Metrics Working Group (RISK WG)

standard-readme compliant

Read our Launch Plan

Risk is a new group, focused on metrics for issues pertaining to Risk in open source.

Economic value is expressed in different ways for different types of stakeholders. We will be exploring this space in the coming months.

| Focus Area | Goal | |------------|------| |1. Business Risk | Understand how active a community exists around/to support a given software package. | |2. Code Quality | Understand the quality of a given software package.| |3. Licensing | Understand the potential IP issues associated with a given software package’s use.| |4. Security | Understand security processes and procedures associated with the software’s development.| |5. Transparency | Understand how transparent a given software package is with respect to dependencies, licensing (?), security processes, etc.| |6. Dependency Risk Assessment | Understand software dependency risk.|

Join our Mailing List

This CHAOSS working group is using the general CHAOSS mailing list.

Join our Weekly Calls

The Risk Working Group meets every other Monday from 11-12 Pacific Time. All are welcome.

The videoconference URL is https://zoom.us/j/4998687533.

You can also read our meeting notes.

Background

Problem Statement

We have gotten requests from community members to establish industry-standard metrics for risk in open source. Lack of metrics makes it difficult for business decision makers to compare open-source methods to alternatives. Lack of metrics makes it difficult to allocate resources optimally across projects, slowing decision making and product innovation.

Opportunity

We believe that risk metrics can accelerate the adoption of open source methods within industry, providing more opportunities for developers to make a living wage in open source.

Goal

Identify Stakeholders and Validate Interest - Identify market segments and stakeholders - Understand Who cares about Open Source Risk (and why) - Specify and prioritize Key Performance Indicators - Calculate potential aggregate risk

Grow hands-on community - CHAOSS Members: Consultants, researchers, grant writers - Project Stakeholders: Sponsors, maintainers, contributors, consumers

Build reusable assets - Repeatable methodology for discovering value - MVP Tooling with Development Roadmap

In the long term, we’d like to publish trusted industry-standard Risk Metrics. A kind of S&P for software development, an authoritative source for metrics significance and industry norms.

Work To Date

We're just getting started!

Contributors

Maintainers

Core Contributors

The criteria for becoming a core contributor is to participate at least once per month over a period of 3 months. Participation could include providing feedback in the weekly D&I meetings, providing feedback on docs, or making other contributions on GitHub (commits / issues). People not participating over a 3 month period may be removed as core contributors.

If you'd like to be on our squad, an easy way to start is by going through the issue list and fixing some. :tada:

All Contributors

Are you eligible to be on this list? You are if you helped in any capacity, for example: Filed an issue. Created a Pull Request. Gave feedback on our work. The team will try to update this list monthly, but please open an issue or post on the mailing list if we've missed anyone.

If you find yourself missing, please create a pull request or reach out to a maintainer. We started to maintain this list after starting the working group and are likely missing some of you. If you find yourself listed here and want to be removed, please create a pull request or ask a maintainer.

Owner

  • Name: CHAOSS
  • Login: chaoss
  • Kind: organization

GitHub Events

Total
  • Delete event: 5
  • Issue comment event: 5
  • Push event: 19
  • Pull request review comment event: 2
  • Pull request review event: 13
  • Pull request event: 34
  • Fork event: 2
  • Create event: 3
Last Year
  • Delete event: 5
  • Issue comment event: 5
  • Push event: 19
  • Pull request review comment event: 2
  • Pull request review event: 13
  • Pull request event: 34
  • Fork event: 2
  • Create event: 3

Committers

Last synced: about 1 year ago

All Time
  • Total Commits: 291
  • Total Committers: 25
  • Avg Commits per committer: 11.64
  • Development Distribution Score (DDS): 0.787
Past Year
  • Commits: 58
  • Committers: 7
  • Avg Commits per committer: 8.286
  • Development Distribution Score (DDS): 0.569
Top Committers
Name Email Commits
Sean P. Goggins s@g****m 62
Matt Germonprez g****z@g****m 48
Kevin Lumbard k****d@g****m 37
Yigakpoa Samuel 9****a 25
Matt Snell m****l@u****u 23
Vinod K. Ahuja v****a@u****u 21
peculiaruc p****2@g****m 18
Georg J.P. Link l****g@g****m 14
Elizabeth Barron e****h@n****t 11
ritik-malik r****6@i****n 8
Yash Prakash y****9@g****m 4
Lucas Gonze l****s@g****m 3
Dawn M. Foster d****n@d****m 3
Yehui Wang y****h@g****m 2
Seunfunmi Adegoke 5****a 2
Alberto Pérez García-Plaza a****a@b****m 1
Cali Dolfi 4****i 1
Jamie Tanna j****e@j****k 1
Kate Stewart k****t 1
King Gao k****o@h****m 1
Luis Cañas-Díaz l****s@b****m 1
Marie c****s@g****m 1
Precious Onyewuchi 4****0 1
Tom Hastings t****m@h****v 1
Venu Vardhan Reddy Tekula v****8@g****m 1
Committer Domains (Top 20 + Academic)

Issues and Pull Requests

Last synced: 11 months ago

All Time
  • Total issues: 53
  • Total pull requests: 76
  • Average time to close issues: 8 months
  • Average time to close pull requests: 2 months
  • Total issue authors: 17
  • Total pull request authors: 28
  • Average comments per issue: 3.11
  • Average comments per pull request: 0.5
  • Merged pull requests: 59
  • Bot issues: 0
  • Bot pull requests: 0
Past Year
  • Issues: 0
  • Pull requests: 21
  • Average time to close issues: N/A
  • Average time to close pull requests: 17 days
  • Issue authors: 0
  • Pull request authors: 4
  • Average comments per issue: 0
  • Average comments per pull request: 0.24
  • Merged pull requests: 17
  • Bot issues: 0
  • Bot pull requests: 0
Top Authors
Issue Authors
  • germonprez (12)
  • GeorgLink (12)
  • klumb (11)
  • vinodkahuja (3)
  • king-gao (2)
  • ritik-malik (2)
  • li-clement (1)
  • canasdiaz (1)
  • david-a-wheeler (1)
  • agallo70 (1)
  • alpgarcia (1)
  • yash-yp (1)
  • lucasgonze (1)
  • emmairwin (1)
  • sgoggins (1)
Pull Request Authors
  • peculiaruc (19)
  • yigakpoa (10)
  • germonprez (6)
  • sgoggins (6)
  • vinodkahuja (6)
  • klumb (5)
  • GeorgLink (3)
  • lucasgonze (3)
  • seun-beta (2)
  • eyehwan (2)
  • canasdiaz (2)
  • ElizabethN (2)
  • yash-yp (2)
  • jamietanna (2)
  • ritik-malik (2)
Top Labels
Issue Labels
Metrics Candidate Release (8) metric idea (7) Metrics Release Notes (4) bug (3) help wanted (3) enhancement (2) good first issue (2) question (1)
Pull Request Labels