https://github.com/cjabradshaw/megafaunasusceptibility

Build stochastic demographic models of extinct megafauna of Sahul

https://github.com/cjabradshaw/megafaunasusceptibility

Science Score: 23.0%

This score indicates how likely this project is to be science-related based on various indicators:

  • CITATION.cff file
  • codemeta.json file
  • .zenodo.json file
  • DOI references
    Found 5 DOI reference(s) in README
  • Academic publication links
    Links to: scholar.google
  • Committers with academic emails
  • Institutional organization owner
  • JOSS paper metadata
  • Scientific vocabulary similarity
    Low similarity (6.7%) to scientific vocabulary

Keywords

australia carnivores demographic-models demography extinction flightless-birds macropodiformes marsupials new-guinea palaeoecology population-ecology sahul vombatiformes
Last synced: 5 months ago · JSON representation

Repository

Build stochastic demographic models of extinct megafauna of Sahul

Basic Info
Statistics
  • Stars: 1
  • Watchers: 3
  • Forks: 2
  • Open Issues: 0
  • Releases: 0
Topics
australia carnivores demographic-models demography extinction flightless-birds macropodiformes marsupials new-guinea palaeoecology population-ecology sahul vombatiformes
Created over 5 years ago · Last pushed almost 3 years ago
Metadata Files
Readme License

README.md

Megafauna Susceptibility

thylacine

R code accompanies article:

BRADSHAW, CJA, CN JOHNSON, J LLEWELYN, V WEISBECKER, G STRONA, F SALTRÉ. 2021. Relative demographic susceptibility does not explain the extinction chronology of Sahul’s megafauna. eLife 10: e63870. doi:10.7554/eLife.63870

AIM: construct plausible stochastic demographic models for main Sahul megafauna to determine relative demographic susceptibility to environmental change & novel predation (human) sources

Abstract

Thylacoleo The causes of Sahul’s megafauna extinctions remain uncertain, although several interacting factors were likely responsible. To examine the relative support for hypotheses regarding plausible ecological mechanisms underlying these extinctions, we constructed the first stochastic, age-structured models for 13 extinct megafauna species from five functional/taxonomic groups, as well as 8 extant species within these groups for comparison. Perturbing specific demographic rates individually, we tested which species were more demographically susceptible to extinction, and then compared these relative sensitivities to the fossil-derived extinction chronology. Our models show that the macropodiformes were the least demographically susceptible to extinction, followed by carnivores, monotremes, vombatiform herbivores, and large birds. Five of the eight extant species were as or more susceptible than the extinct species. There was no clear relationship between extinction susceptibility and the extinction chronology for any perturbation scenario, while body mass and generation length explained much of the variation in relative risk. Our results reveal that the actual mechanisms leading to the observed extinction chronology were unlikely related to variation in demographic susceptibility per se, but were possibly driven instead by finer-scale variation in climate change and/or human prey choice and relative hunting success. Diprotodon


Prof Corey J. A. Bradshaw
Global Ecology, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
August 2020
e-mail

Groups/genera modelled

Palorchestes - VOMBATIFORM HERBIVORES: Diprotodon (†), Palorchestes (†), Zygomaturus (†), Phascolonus (†), Vombatus ursinus
- MACROPODIFORM HERBIVORES: Protemnodon (†), Osphranter rufus, Sthenurus (†), Simosthenurus (†), Procoptodon (†), Metasthenurus (†), Notamacropus
- LARGE BIRDS: Genyornis (†), Dromaius novaehollandiae, Alectura lathami
- CARNIVORES: Sarcophilus, Thylacinus (†), Thylacoleo (†), Dasyurus
- MONOTREMES: Megalibgwilia (†), Tachyglossus

Demographic parameters for each species summarised below (Appendix 2, table 1 in the original article)

Appendix 2 table 1

Repository includes the following files

Simosthenurus - Sahul megafauna demographic susceptibility-base models.R — constructs bases models for all perturbation scenarios (must be run first) - matrixOperators.R — functions to manipulate matrix models - megsuscept.SCENARIO2.juvsurv.R — runs Scenario 2 (reduction in juvenile survival) - megsuscept.SCENARIO3.fertred.R — runs Scenario 3 (reduction in fertility) - megsuscept.SCENARIO4.survred.R — runs Scenario 4 (reduction in all-ages survival) - megsuscept.SCENARIO5.indrem.R — runs Scenario 5 (increasing individual offtake) - megsuscept.SCENARIO6.catinc.R — runs Scenario 6 (increasing frequency of catastrophic die-offs) - megsuscept.SCENARIO7.catMinc.R — runs Scenario 7 (increasing magnitude of catastrophic die-offs)

** NOTE: For Scenario 7, Scenario 6 must be run first to create input .csv file 'catincQpr.csv' **

Sensitivity analysis

  • GRIWM.jk.sensitivity.R — is the Gaussian-Resampled, Inverse-Weighted McInerny (GRIWM) Signor-Lipps algorithm, including a jack-knife estimator to test senstivity of dates to different assumptions. This R code is applied to the various chronologies for the following taxa (.csv files in the 'chronologies' sub-folder): Diprotodon, Palorchestes, Zygomaturus, Phascolonus, Protemnodon, Sthenurus, Simosthenurus, Procoptodon, Metasthenurus, Genyornis, Thylacoleo, Megalibgwilia

Flinders University logo GEL logo CABAH logo

Owner

  • Name: Corey Bradshaw
  • Login: cjabradshaw
  • Kind: user
  • Location: Adelaide, South Australia
  • Company: Flinders University

Matthew Flinders Professor of Global Ecology @GlobalEcologyFlinders @CABAH

GitHub Events

Total
Last Year

Committers

Last synced: about 2 years ago

All Time
  • Total Commits: 61
  • Total Committers: 1
  • Avg Commits per committer: 61.0
  • Development Distribution Score (DDS): 0.0
Past Year
  • Commits: 11
  • Committers: 1
  • Avg Commits per committer: 11.0
  • Development Distribution Score (DDS): 0.0
Top Committers
Name Email Commits
Corey Bradshaw c****w@g****m 61

Issues and Pull Requests

Last synced: about 2 years ago

All Time
  • Total issues: 0
  • Total pull requests: 0
  • Average time to close issues: N/A
  • Average time to close pull requests: N/A
  • Total issue authors: 0
  • Total pull request authors: 0
  • Average comments per issue: 0
  • Average comments per pull request: 0
  • Merged pull requests: 0
  • Bot issues: 0
  • Bot pull requests: 0
Past Year
  • Issues: 0
  • Pull requests: 0
  • Average time to close issues: N/A
  • Average time to close pull requests: N/A
  • Issue authors: 0
  • Pull request authors: 0
  • Average comments per issue: 0
  • Average comments per pull request: 0
  • Merged pull requests: 0
  • Bot issues: 0
  • Bot pull requests: 0
Top Authors
Issue Authors
Pull Request Authors
Top Labels
Issue Labels
Pull Request Labels