https://github.com/clima/slurm-buildkite
Run buildkite jobs on a slurm cluster
Science Score: 26.0%
This score indicates how likely this project is to be science-related based on various indicators:
-
○CITATION.cff file
-
✓codemeta.json file
Found codemeta.json file -
✓.zenodo.json file
Found .zenodo.json file -
○DOI references
-
○Academic publication links
-
○Committers with academic emails
-
○Institutional organization owner
-
○JOSS paper metadata
-
○Scientific vocabulary similarity
Low similarity (9.1%) to scientific vocabulary
Keywords
Keywords from Contributors
Repository
Run buildkite jobs on a slurm cluster
Basic Info
Statistics
- Stars: 11
- Watchers: 6
- Forks: 1
- Open Issues: 9
- Releases: 0
Topics
Metadata Files
README.md
Buildkite on HPC
Run Buildkite pipelines on an HPC cluster. To get started, see our set-up guide.
Design
The basic idea is that each Buildkite job is run inside a scheduled HPC job: the job runs the Buildkite agent with the --acquire-job option, which ensures that only the specific Buildkite job is scheduled, and is terminated and exits once complete.
Some clusters are not web-accessible, so we are unable to use webhooks to schedule their jobs. Instead poll the Buildkite API (via bin/poll.py) via a cron job running on the cluser login node (bin/cron.sh at a regular interval (currently every minute). This does the following:
Get a list of the Buildkite jobs which are currently queued or running on the cluster.
Query the Buildkite API to get a list of all builds for the organization that are currently scheduled. For each build, and for each job in the build, if the job is not already scheduled on the cluster, then schedule a new job to run
bin/schedule_job.sh.Query the Buildkite API for a list of all builds that are cancelled. For each build and each job in the build, cancel any Slurm jobs with the matching job id.
Unlike regular Buildkite builds, we don't run each job in an isolated environment, so the checkout only happens on the first job (usually the pipeline upload) and the state is shared between all jobs in the build.
Passing options to Slurm
Any options in the agent metadata block which are prefixed with slurm_ are passed to sbatch: underscores _ are converted to hyphens.
For arguments without values, they must be set to true.
As an example,
agents:
queue: new-central
slurm_nodes: 1
slurm_tasks_per_node: 2
slurm_exclusive: true
would pass the options --nodes=1 --tasks-per-node=2.
Passing options to PBS
Any options prefixed with pbs_ are passed to qsub. Any options prefixed with pbs_l_ are passed through to qsub's -l argument. Underscores are converted to hyphens.
For arguments without values, they must be set to true.
As an example,
agents:
pbs_q: preempt
pbs_l_select: "2:ngpus=4:ncpus=8"
pbs_l_walltime: "02:00:00"
would pass the options -q preempt -l select=2:ngpus=4:ncpus=8 -l walltime=02:00:00
Testing CUDA and MPI modules
The file .buildkite/testcudampi.jl runs basic tests for MPI with CUDA. This test requires two CUDA devices, Julia and CUDA-aware MPI to run.
The following command will run the test file with two MPI ranks, profiling it with Nsight Systems.
mpirun -n 2 nsys profile --trace=cuda,mpi julia --project=.buildkite .buildkite/test_cuda_mpi.jl
The following tests are run:
1. CUDA smoke test running a basic computation on CUDA device
2. MPI test transferring arrays between CPU cores
3. MPI test transferring arrays between CUDA devices
The following command analyzes the profiling data and returns the type of transfer used to send CUDA arrays between devices.
nsys stats --report cuda_gpu_trace report1.nsys-rep
If your CUDA-aware MPI is configured correctly, you should see a peer-to-peer (PtoP) transfer: [CUDA memcpy PtoP], indicating that the CUDA devices are able to transfer data directly between one another:
If you only see [CUDA memcpy Device-to-Host], it is likely that your CUDA devices are not able to transfer data directly, resulting in a major performance decrease for distributed computations.
This test is run against pull requests using a Buildkite pipeline.
Owner
- Name: Climate Modeling Alliance
- Login: CliMA
- Kind: organization
- Email: clima@caltech.edu
- Website: https://clima.caltech.edu
- Repositories: 67
- Profile: https://github.com/CliMA
An alliance of scientists, engineers and applied mathematicians, dedicated to pioneering a new, data-informed approach to climate modeling
GitHub Events
Total
- Create event: 10
- Issues event: 22
- Watch event: 2
- Delete event: 1
- Issue comment event: 11
- Push event: 92
- Gollum event: 3
- Pull request event: 26
- Pull request review event: 34
- Pull request review comment event: 26
- Fork event: 1
Last Year
- Create event: 10
- Issues event: 22
- Watch event: 2
- Delete event: 1
- Issue comment event: 11
- Push event: 92
- Gollum event: 3
- Pull request event: 26
- Pull request review event: 34
- Pull request review comment event: 26
- Fork event: 1
Committers
Last synced: over 2 years ago
Top Committers
| Name | Commits | |
|---|---|---|
| Simon Byrne | s****e@g****m | 51 |
| jakebolewski | j****i@g****m | 18 |
| Charles Kawczynski | k****s@g****m | 4 |
Issues and Pull Requests
Last synced: 10 months ago
All Time
- Total issues: 23
- Total pull requests: 33
- Average time to close issues: 3 months
- Average time to close pull requests: 5 days
- Total issue authors: 4
- Total pull request authors: 5
- Average comments per issue: 1.87
- Average comments per pull request: 0.24
- Merged pull requests: 28
- Bot issues: 0
- Bot pull requests: 0
Past Year
- Issues: 2
- Pull requests: 7
- Average time to close issues: N/A
- Average time to close pull requests: 1 day
- Issue authors: 2
- Pull request authors: 2
- Average comments per issue: 0.0
- Average comments per pull request: 0.14
- Merged pull requests: 5
- Bot issues: 0
- Bot pull requests: 0
Top Authors
Issue Authors
- simonbyrne (14)
- Sbozzolo (8)
- jakebolewski (7)
- nefrathenrici (6)
Pull Request Authors
- jakebolewski (13)
- nefrathenrici (10)
- simonbyrne (10)
- Sbozzolo (7)
- charleskawczynski (5)
- imreddyTeja (1)