https://github.com/cloneofsimo/consistency_models
Unofficial Implementation of Consistency Models in pytorch
Science Score: 36.0%
This score indicates how likely this project is to be science-related based on various indicators:
-
○CITATION.cff file
-
✓codemeta.json file
Found codemeta.json file -
○.zenodo.json file
-
✓DOI references
Found 6 DOI reference(s) in README -
✓Academic publication links
Links to: arxiv.org -
○Academic email domains
-
○Institutional organization owner
-
○JOSS paper metadata
-
○Scientific vocabulary similarity
Low similarity (10.3%) to scientific vocabulary
Keywords
Repository
Unofficial Implementation of Consistency Models in pytorch
Basic Info
- Host: GitHub
- Owner: cloneofsimo
- Language: Python
- Default Branch: master
- Homepage: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.01469
- Size: 522 KB
Statistics
- Stars: 254
- Watchers: 14
- Forks: 11
- Open Issues: 3
- Releases: 0
Topics
Metadata Files
README.md
Consistency Models
30 Epoch, Consistency Model with 2 step. Using $t1 = 2, t2 = 80$.
30 Epoch, Consistency Model with 5 step. Using $t_i \in {5, 10, 20,40, 80}$.
Unofficial Implementation of Consistency Models (paper) in pytorch.
Three days ago, legendary man Yang Song released entirely new set of generative model, called consistency models. There aren't yet any open implementations, so here is my attempt at it.
What are they?
Diffusion models are amazing, because they enable you to sample high fidelity + high diversity images. Downside is, you need lots of steps, something at least 20.
Progressive Distillation (Salimans & Ho, 2022) solves this with distillating 2-steps of the diffusion model down to single step. Doing this N times boosts sampling speed by $2^N$. But is this the only way? Do we need to train diffusion model and distill it $n$ times? Yang didn't think so. Consistency model solves this by mainly trianing a model to make a consistent denosing for different timesteps (Ok I'm obviously simplifying)
Usage
Install the package with
bash
pip install git+https://github.com/cloneofsimo/consistency_models.git
This repo mainly implements consistency training:
$$ L(\theta) = \mathbb{E}[d(f\theta(x + t{n + 1}z, t{n + 1}), f{\theta{-}}(x + tn z, t_n))] $$
And sampling:
$$ \begin{align} z &\sim \mathcal{N}(0, I) \ x &\leftarrow x + \sqrt{tn ^2 - \epsilon^2} z \ x &\leftarrow f\theta(x, t_n) \ \end{align} $$
There is a self-contained MNIST training example on the root main.py.
bash
python main.py
Todo
- [x] EMA
- [x] CIFAR10 Example
- [x] Samples are sooo fuzzy... try to get a crisp result.
- [ ] Consistency Distillation
Reference
```bibtex @misc{https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2303.01469, doi = {10.48550/ARXIV.2303.01469},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.01469},
author = {Song, Yang and Dhariwal, Prafulla and Chen, Mark and Sutskever, Ilya},
keywords = {Machine Learning (cs.LG), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), Machine Learning (stat.ML), FOS: Computer and information sciences, FOS: Computer and information sciences},
title = {Consistency Models},
publisher = {arXiv},
year = {2023},
copyright = {arXiv.org perpetual, non-exclusive license} } ```
```bibtex @misc{https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2202.00512, doi = {10.48550/ARXIV.2202.00512},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.00512},
author = {Salimans, Tim and Ho, Jonathan},
keywords = {Machine Learning (cs.LG), Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Machine Learning (stat.ML), FOS: Computer and information sciences, FOS: Computer and information sciences},
title = {Progressive Distillation for Fast Sampling of Diffusion Models},
publisher = {arXiv},
year = {2022},
copyright = {arXiv.org perpetual, non-exclusive license} } ```
Owner
- Name: Simo Ryu
- Login: cloneofsimo
- Kind: user
- Company: Corca AI
- Website: https://fb.com/MLPaperFetchingCat
- Twitter: cloneofsimo
- Repositories: 10
- Profile: https://github.com/cloneofsimo
Cats are Turing machines cloneofsimo@gmail.com
GitHub Events
Total
- Watch event: 14
Last Year
- Watch event: 14
Issues and Pull Requests
Last synced: 10 months ago
All Time
- Total issues: 5
- Total pull requests: 1
- Average time to close issues: 5 months
- Average time to close pull requests: 1 day
- Total issue authors: 5
- Total pull request authors: 1
- Average comments per issue: 1.0
- Average comments per pull request: 4.0
- Merged pull requests: 0
- Bot issues: 0
- Bot pull requests: 0
Past Year
- Issues: 0
- Pull requests: 0
- Average time to close issues: N/A
- Average time to close pull requests: N/A
- Issue authors: 0
- Pull request authors: 0
- Average comments per issue: 0
- Average comments per pull request: 0
- Merged pull requests: 0
- Bot issues: 0
- Bot pull requests: 0
Top Authors
Issue Authors
- JunyaoHu (1)
- kimihailv (1)
- cantabile-kwok (1)
- Njasa2k (1)
- discordance (1)
Pull Request Authors
- tcapelle (1)