Data

Tools

Indexes

Applications

Experiments

Open Source Science

https://github.com/crsh/psych-transparency-guide_workshop

Material for the workshop "A practical primer on transparent research workflows"

https://github.com/crsh/psych-transparency-guide_workshop

Science Score: 26.0%

This score indicates how likely this project is to be science-related based on various indicators:

  • ○
    CITATION.cff file
  • ✓
    codemeta.json file
    Found codemeta.json file
  • ○
    .zenodo.json file
  • ✓
    DOI references
    Found 5 DOI reference(s) in README
  • ○
    Academic publication links
  • ○
    Academic email domains
  • ○
    Institutional organization owner
  • ○
    JOSS paper metadata
  • ○
    Scientific vocabulary similarity
    Low similarity (8.5%) to scientific vocabulary
Last synced: 9 months ago · JSON representation

Repository

Material for the workshop "A practical primer on transparent research workflows"

Basic Info
  • Host: GitHub
  • Owner: crsh
  • Language: HTML
  • Default Branch: master
  • Homepage:
  • Size: 44.2 MB
Statistics
  • Stars: 5
  • Watchers: 2
  • Forks: 1
  • Open Issues: 0
  • Releases: 3
Created about 8 years ago · Last pushed over 2 years ago
Metadata Files
Readme

README.md

Workshop "A practical primer on transparent research workflows"

Frederik Aust (frederik.aust@uni-koeln.de, \@frederikaust); Johannes Breuer (johannes.breuer@gesis.org, \@MattEagle09)

Please link to workshop GitHub repository and cite Klein et al. (2018).

Abstract

Psychological science is facing a crisis of confidence fueled by concerns about replicability of empirical findings (e.g., Open Science Collaboration, 2015). In response, psychologists have been reviewing how they do research and are leading many initiatives to improve replicability. A fundamental element is greater transparency and intersubjective verifiability: Researchers increasingly publish research materials, data and analysis scripts, publicly preregister their studies, and share and discuss preprints. The evolving open science ecosystem provides a variety of tools and services to help researchers adopt transparent research practices. However, setting up a transparent research workflow involves a plethora of decisions that can be off-putting. Fortunately, transparent research practices can be adopted piecemeal---each incremental step adds positive value for individual researchers and the credibility of psychological research. This active workshop will walk participants through the process of preparing and sharing their research products, including materials, data, analysis scripts, and study protocols. It will address what, when, and how to share and help participants develop transparent, less error-prone, and more reproducible research workflows.

Workshop material

Please see the outline for an overview of the covered topics. The contents of the workshop is illustrated in the slides and summarized in the handout.

Acknowledgements

Materials are based on Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Hofelich Mohr, A., … Frank, M. C. (2018). A Practical Guide for Transparency in Psychological Science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1). doi: 10.1525/collabra.158 (Supplementary material)

Example project stimulus images courtesy of Michael J. Tarr, Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition and Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, http://www.tarrlab.org/. Funding provided by NSF award 0339122. CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0

Icons by Icons8, CC-BY-ND 3.0.

Owner

  • Name: Frederik Aust
  • Login: crsh
  • Kind: user
  • Location: Cologne, Germany
  • Company: Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam

GitHub Events

Total
Last Year

Issues and Pull Requests

Last synced: about 1 year ago

All Time
  • Total issues: 0
  • Total pull requests: 1
  • Average time to close issues: N/A
  • Average time to close pull requests: 10 months
  • Total issue authors: 0
  • Total pull request authors: 1
  • Average comments per issue: 0
  • Average comments per pull request: 3.0
  • Merged pull requests: 0
  • Bot issues: 0
  • Bot pull requests: 0
Past Year
  • Issues: 0
  • Pull requests: 0
  • Average time to close issues: N/A
  • Average time to close pull requests: N/A
  • Issue authors: 0
  • Pull request authors: 0
  • Average comments per issue: 0
  • Average comments per pull request: 0
  • Merged pull requests: 0
  • Bot issues: 0
  • Bot pull requests: 0
View more stats
Top Authors
Issue Authors
Pull Request Authors
  • katrinleinweber (1)
Top Labels
Issue Labels
Pull Request Labels