fastcleverseg

FastCleverSegMethod

https://github.com/jonathanramos/fastcleverseg

Science Score: 49.0%

This score indicates how likely this project is to be science-related based on various indicators:

  • CITATION.cff file
  • codemeta.json file
    Found codemeta.json file
  • .zenodo.json file
    Found .zenodo.json file
  • DOI references
    Found 2 DOI reference(s) in README
  • Academic publication links
    Links to: sciencedirect.com
  • Academic email domains
  • Institutional organization owner
  • JOSS paper metadata
  • Scientific vocabulary similarity
    Low similarity (7.8%) to scientific vocabulary
Last synced: 6 months ago · JSON representation

Repository

FastCleverSegMethod

Basic Info
  • Host: GitHub
  • Owner: JonathanRamos
  • License: gpl-3.0
  • Language: C++
  • Default Branch: main
  • Size: 1.94 GB
Statistics
  • Stars: 1
  • Watchers: 1
  • Forks: 0
  • Open Issues: 0
  • Releases: 0
Created over 4 years ago · Last pushed over 1 year ago
Metadata Files
Readme License Citation

README.md

FastCleverSeg

Since the manual segmentation is time-consuming and impractical to perform for a large number of exams, semi-automatic segmentation tools minimize the labor-intensiveness by using minimal user input. We propose FastCleverSeg, in which the experimental evaluation with several MRI databases from distinct hospitals showed that our approach can considerably speed up the manual annotation process with a Dice Score of 94\% and the fastest processing time ($25 \pm 30$ ms). Therefore, our approaches can aid physicians in producing reliable ground-truths in a fast manner, speeding up the laborious task of manually segmenting regions of interest.

If you use any part of this repository, please cite:

Jonathan S. Ramoset al., Fast and accurate 3-D spine MRI segmentation using FastCleverSeg, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Volume 109, 2024, Pages 134-146, ISSN 0730-725X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2024.03.021. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X24000778)

We made avaiable all our codes, datasets and results as follows: - Algorithms and codes - Image Datasets - Results

Results

Results considering each anatomical group available at: Muscles, Discs, and Vertebrae.

Here, we present the overall results as follows:

Results Without EANIS

Figure 2: Example of annotations. image

Figure 3: Overall results comparison image

Figure 4: Segmentation Results Comparison. image

Owner

  • Name: Jonathan Ramos
  • Login: JonathanRamos
  • Kind: user

PhD Student - University of São Paulo - USP

GitHub Events

Total
Last Year