dsd-vocabulary
The Data Source Description Vocabulary (DSD) allows the representation of data sources and their internal structure independently of their type.
Science Score: 67.0%
This score indicates how likely this project is to be science-related based on various indicators:
-
✓CITATION.cff file
Found CITATION.cff file -
✓codemeta.json file
Found codemeta.json file -
✓.zenodo.json file
Found .zenodo.json file -
✓DOI references
Found 2 DOI reference(s) in README -
✓Academic publication links
Links to: zenodo.org -
○Committers with academic emails
-
○Institutional organization owner
-
○JOSS paper metadata
-
○Scientific vocabulary similarity
Low similarity (11.6%) to scientific vocabulary
Keywords
Repository
The Data Source Description Vocabulary (DSD) allows the representation of data sources and their internal structure independently of their type.
Basic Info
- Host: GitHub
- Owner: FAW-JKU
- License: lgpl-2.1
- Default Branch: main
- Homepage: https://w3id.org/dsd
- Size: 34.2 KB
Statistics
- Stars: 2
- Watchers: 1
- Forks: 0
- Open Issues: 0
- Releases: 3
Topics
Metadata Files
README.md
The Data Source Description Vocabulary (DSD)
The Data Source Description Vocabulary (DSD) is an vocabulary based on RDF and OWL that can be used to represent data sources and their internal structure in ontologies.
A documentation describing the available OWL classes and properties of the current version (4.0) of the vocabulary can be found at https://w3id.org/dsd.
The vocabulary itself can be downloaded in the release section of this repository. Additionally, it can be imported directly in tools like Protégé by using the IRI https://w3id.org/dsd.
A scientific publication about the DSD vocabulary is currently submitted for review.
FAIR
Starting with version 4.0, the DSD vocabulary is evaluated automatically and manually against the FAIR principles [1].
- The result of a manual evalaution is available at https://w3id.org/dsd/evaluation
- The vocabulary in version 4.0 was evaluated using the Fair Ontology Pitfall Scanner (FOOPS!). It received a score of 78%, although several issues highlighted by FOOPS! are not present when looking at the DSD manually (e.g., metadata for authors are indeed present). We therefore claim that the real score will be higher than 78%.
Provenance
We see provenance information not as part of a vocabulary. Therefore, such information is not included in the vocabulary, but can be retrieved using this repository.
Changes between the current version (4.0) and DSD version 3.0
Changes between DSD version 2.0 and 3.0
Contribution
We appreciate contributions and encourage you to submit suggestions by creating an issue in this GitHub repository.
License
The Data Source Description Vocabulary (DSD) is available under the LGPL-2.1 license. Please see the LICENSE file for details.
Contact information
- Author: Lisa Ehrlinger (lisa.ehrlinger@scch.at)
- Contributor: Johannes Schrott (johannes.schrott@jku.at, johannes.schrott@scch.at)
Homepage: https://dqm.faw.jku.at
References
[1] Wilkinson et al. ‘The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship’. Scientific Data 3, no. 1 (December 2016): 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18.
Owner
- Name: FAW-JKU
- Login: FAW-JKU
- Kind: organization
- Repositories: 1
- Profile: https://github.com/FAW-JKU
Citation (CITATION.cff)
cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this vocabulary, please cite it as below." authors: - family-names: "Ehrlinger" given-names: "Lisa" orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5313-0368" - family-names: "Schrott" given-names: "Johannes" orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2689-0876" - family-names: "Wöß" given-names: "Wolfram" title: "DSD: The Data Source Description Vocabulary" version: 4.0 url: "https://github.com/FAW-JKU/dsd-vocabulary"
GitHub Events
Total
Last Year
Committers
Last synced: about 2 years ago
Top Committers
| Name | Commits | |
|---|---|---|
| Johannes Schrott | 2****t | 5 |
| Johannes Schrott | j****t@s****t | 5 |
Committer Domains (Top 20 + Academic)
Issues and Pull Requests
Last synced: about 2 years ago
All Time
- Total issues: 0
- Total pull requests: 3
- Average time to close issues: N/A
- Average time to close pull requests: 5 minutes
- Total issue authors: 0
- Total pull request authors: 1
- Average comments per issue: 0
- Average comments per pull request: 0.33
- Merged pull requests: 3
- Bot issues: 0
- Bot pull requests: 0
Past Year
- Issues: 0
- Pull requests: 3
- Average time to close issues: N/A
- Average time to close pull requests: 5 minutes
- Issue authors: 0
- Pull request authors: 1
- Average comments per issue: 0
- Average comments per pull request: 0.33
- Merged pull requests: 3
- Bot issues: 0
- Bot pull requests: 0
Top Authors
Issue Authors
Pull Request Authors
- johannesschrott (3)