git-commit-message
Git commit message: how to write a great git commit message and commit template for version control
Science Score: 44.0%
This score indicates how likely this project is to be science-related based on various indicators:
-
✓CITATION.cff file
Found CITATION.cff file -
✓codemeta.json file
Found codemeta.json file -
✓.zenodo.json file
Found .zenodo.json file -
○DOI references
-
○Academic publication links
-
○Committers with academic emails
-
○Institutional organization owner
-
○JOSS paper metadata
-
○Scientific vocabulary similarity
Low similarity (10.1%) to scientific vocabulary
Repository
Git commit message: how to write a great git commit message and commit template for version control
Statistics
- Stars: 1,276
- Watchers: 24
- Forks: 122
- Open Issues: 0
- Releases: 0
Metadata Files
README.md
Git commit message
To write a great git commit message, take a look at these guidelines and suggestions.
Contents:
- Top priorities
- Begin with a short summary line
- Continue with a longer description
- Summary examples
- Summary keywords
- Real-world examples
- Use semantic versioning
- Specifics for right and wrong
- Specifics for length
- Reasoning
- Reject these formats
- Optional: use contact email addresses
- Optional: use task tracking links
- Optional: use resource tracking metrics
- Optional: use keywords, importance, references, etc.
- Related links
Top priorities
For the best git commit messages:
Read these guidelines and suggestions, then discuss them with your teammates.
Emphasize clear communication, because commit messages help you and your teammates.
Use a git commit template, such as ours here.
Begin with a short summary line
Begin with a short summary line a.k.a. message subject:
Start with an imperative present active verb: Add, Drop, Fix, Refactor, Optimize, etc.
Use up to 50 characters; this is the git official preference.
Finish without a sentence-ending period.
Continue with a longer description
Continue with a longer description a.k.a. message body:
Add a blank line after the summary line, then write as much as you want.
Use up to 72 characters per line for typical text for word wrap.
Use as many characters as needed for atypical text, such as URLs, terminal output, formatted messages, etc.
Include any kind of notes, links, examples, etc. as you want.
Summary examples
Summary examples of good commit messages:
Add foo
Drop foo
Fix foo
Refactor foo
Optimize foo
Summary keywords
We recommend these summary keywords because they use imperative mood, present tense, active voice, and are verbs:
Add: Create a capability e.g. feature, test, dependency.
Drop: Delete a capability e.g. feature, test, dependency.
Fix: Fix an issue e.g. bug, typo, accident, misstatement.
Bump: Increase the version of something e.g. a dependency.
Make: Change the build process, or tools, or infrastructure.
Start: Begin doing something; e.g. enable a toggle, feature flag, etc.
Stop: End doing something; e.g. disable a toggle, feature flag, etc.
Optimize: A change that MUST be just about performance, e.g. speed up code.
Document: A change that MUST be only in the documentation, e.g. help files.
Refactor: A change that MUST be just a refactoring patch
Reformat: A change that MUST be just a formatting patch, e.g. change spaces.
Rearrange: A change that MUST be just an arranging patch, e.g. change layout.
Redraw: A change that MUST be just a drawing patch, e.g. change a graphic, image, icon, etc.
Reword: A change that MUST be just a wording patch, e.g. change a comment, label, doc, etc.
Revise: A change that MUST be just a revising patch e.g. a change, an alteration, a correction, etc.
Refit/Refresh/Renew/Reload: A change that MUST be just a patch e.g. update test data, API keys, etc.
We recommend these summary keywords for things that don't fit into the above categories:
Major: Anything that causes a major version increase.
Minor: Anything that causes a minor version increase.
Patch: Anything that causes a patch version increase.
Real-world examples
Real-world examples show how we use imperative mood, present tense, active voice, and verbs:
Add feature for a user to like a post
Drop feature for a user to like a post
Fix association between a user and a post
Update dependency library to current version
Make build process use caches for speed
Start feature flag for a user to like a post
Stop feature flag for a user to like a post
Optimize search speed for a user to see posts
Document community guidelines for post content
Refactor user model to new language syntax
Reformat home page text to use more whitespace
Rearrange buttons so OK is on the lower right
Redraw diagram of how our web app works
Reword home page text to be more welcoming
Revise link to update it to the new URL
Real-world examples for things that don't fit into the above categories:
Major overhaul of our API from version 1 to 2
Minor improvement of our API from version 1.1 to 1.2
Patch our API from version 1.1.1 to 1.1.2
Use semantic versioning
We use semantic versioning for many of our projects:
Add, Start: Increment SemVer MINOR version when there is a new capability.
Drop, Stop: Increment SemVer MAJOR version when there is an incompatibility.
Fix, Update, Make, Optimize, Document: Increment SemVer PATCH version.
Refactor, Reformat, Rearrange, Redraw, Reword: Increment SemVer PATCH version.
Specifics for right and wrong
Capitalize the summary.
Right: Add feature
Wrong: add feature
Finish the summary without a sentence-ending a period.
Right: Add feature
Wrong: Add feature.
If the summary ends with an non-sentence-ending period, use it.
Right: Add feature for U.S.A.
Wrong: Add feature for U.S.A
Use imperative mood: present tense, active voice, and lead verb.
Right: Add feature
Wrong: Adds feature (this is indicative mood, not imperative mood)
Wrong: Added feature (this is past tense, not present tense)
Wrong: Adding feature (this lead is a gerund, not a verb)
Wrong: Feature added (this is passive voice, not active voice)
Specifics for length
Keep the summary line within 50 characters.
The purpose is easy readability.
This is the git official convention.
This is the same convention as writing an email message.
Use a blank line after the summary line.
The purpose is making the commit message parseable by tools.
This is the git official convention.
This is the same convention as writing an email message.
Use up to 72 characters per line for typical text for word wrap.
The purpose is easy readability on typical terminals.
This is the git official convention.
This is the same convention as writing an email message.
Use as many characters as needed for atypical text, such as URLs, output, formatted messages, etc.
The purpose is preserving important formatting.
This is the git official convention.
This is the same convention as writing an email message.
Reasoning
We primarily care that our team communicates effectively with our shared understanding.
We secondarily like these verbs above because they're easy to read, easy to type, and clear in many cultures.
If you and your team prefer other words, that's fine too; use what works for you.
Reject these formats
We reject git commit message styles that put meta-information into the summary line.
Example:
[bug] ...
(release) ...
#12345 ...
docs: ...
JIRA-666 #time 1w 2d 4h 30m #comment Task completed ahead of schedule #resolve
We reject the git commit message style of projects such as Angular, Commitizen defaults, etc.
Because these use a leading tag that is sometimes a word, sometimes an abbreviation, sometimes a plural noun, etc.
Examples are using "feat" for feature, "docs" for document, "perf" for performance improvement, etc.
Instead we use "Add" for adding a feature, "Document" for documenting help, "Optimize" for performance improvement, etc.
Active verbs are easier to skim, and easier to use for people from other cultures who may be less-comfortable using English.
We reject using a ticket id number in the summary line.
Instead, we use fully-qualified URLs in the commit message body.
This is because many of our projects use multiple tracking systems, and multiple ways of launching a URL.
We want URL tracking to be easy to use by a wide range of systems, scripts, and teams.
We reject using a time tracking syntax in the summary line.
Instead, if you want time tracking, put the info in the commit message body.
This is because your personal time tracking is irrelevant to most other developers.
If you must use time tracking, we recommend the format of ISO 8601 and UTC, such as "YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ"
Optional: use contact email addresses
We sometimes have more than one person working on a commit. For example, we do do pair programming.
To keep track of this, we write a git commit message body that lists each person. We use the person's name and the email address. We use one person per line because this is easy to parse.
Co-authored-by: Alice Adams <alice@eaxmple.com>
Co-authored-by: Bob Brown <bob@example.com>
Co-authored-by: Carol Curtis <carol@example.com>
To make this easy, we use a git commit template.
Optional: use task tracking links
We sometimes connect a git commit to a task tracking system or web page that explains more. For example, we use GitHub, Trello, Jira, and many other bug tracking systems and project management software systems.
To keep track of these, we use a git commit message body that lists each URL, one per line, because this is easy to parse.
Example:
Add feature foo
See: https://github.com/user/repo/issues/789
See: https://jira.com/tasks/123
See: https://wikipedia.com/quicksort
If we want to provide link names, then we use Markdown links, such as:
See: [Request for help with sign in](https://github.com/user/repo/issues/789)
See: [Add feature foo](https://jira.com/tasks/123)
See: [Wikipedia Quicksort](https://wikipedia/quicksort)
To make this easy in practice, we use a git template that helps fill in this info.
Optional: use resource tracking metrics
We sometimes connect a git commit to a resource tracking system or metrics scripts. For example, we work on some projects where the project managers must keep track of work hours spent on a commit, or story point estimates per feature branch, or cost of hiring a developer to fix a bug.
To keep track of these, we use a git commit message body that lists each item, one per line, because this is easy to parse.
Example:
Add feature foo
Time: 7 staff hours
Cost: $700
Points: 7
Optional: use keywords, importance, references, etc.
We like to use commit message keywords to help us skim, search, and prioritize.
To keep track of these, we write a git commit message body that uses email header conventions.
Example:
Fix foo
Keywords: security, encryption, authentication
Importance: high
References: ...
Supersedes: ...
Obsoletes: ...
See-Also: ...
We use some of these to help our teams focus on the most important work.
When a commit message says "Importance: high" then it gets priority for code review and also for testing on the continuous integration server.
When a commit message says "Supersedes", "References", "Obsoletes", then we can easily look up the earlier commits or URLs.
Related links
Blog posts about how to write git commit messages:
Tools that help with git commit messages:
Owner
- Name: Joel Parker Henderson
- Login: joelparkerhenderson
- Kind: user
- Location: California
- Website: http://www.joelparkerhenderson.com
- Repositories: 319
- Profile: https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson
Software developer. Technology consultant. Creator of GitAlias.com, NumCommand.com, SixArm.com, and many open source projects.
Citation (CITATION.cff)
cff-version: 1.2.0
title: Git commit message
message: >-
If you use this work and you want to cite it,
then you can use the metadata from this file.
type: software
authors:
- given-names: Joel Parker
family-names: Henderson
email: joel@joelparkerhenderson.com
affiliation: joelparkerhenderson.com
orcid: 'https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4681-282X'
identifiers:
- type: url
value: 'https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/git-commit-message/'
description: Git commit message
repository-code: 'https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/git-commit-message/'
abstract: >-
Git commit message
license: See license file
GitHub Events
Total
- Watch event: 81
- Push event: 2
- Fork event: 5
Last Year
- Watch event: 81
- Push event: 2
- Fork event: 5
Committers
Last synced: 11 months ago
Top Committers
| Name | Commits | |
|---|---|---|
| Joel Parker Henderson | j****l@j****m | 43 |
| Oliver Kopp | k****v@g****m | 4 |
| clach04 | c****4@g****m | 1 |
| Wouter Janson | W****n | 1 |
| Robert Machmer | r****r@g****m | 1 |
| Matthieu Petiteau | m****o@g****m | 1 |
| Huajie Shen | a****n@g****m | 1 |
| Anthony | a****s@e****l | 1 |
Committer Domains (Top 20 + Academic)
Issues and Pull Requests
Last synced: 11 months ago
All Time
- Total issues: 2
- Total pull requests: 12
- Average time to close issues: 15 days
- Average time to close pull requests: 8 months
- Total issue authors: 2
- Total pull request authors: 8
- Average comments per issue: 4.0
- Average comments per pull request: 1.17
- Merged pull requests: 10
- Bot issues: 0
- Bot pull requests: 0
Past Year
- Issues: 0
- Pull requests: 1
- Average time to close issues: N/A
- Average time to close pull requests: 1 day
- Issue authors: 0
- Pull request authors: 1
- Average comments per issue: 0
- Average comments per pull request: 0.0
- Merged pull requests: 1
- Bot issues: 0
- Bot pull requests: 0
Top Authors
Issue Authors
- stevencychuang (1)
- azzamsa (1)
Pull Request Authors
- koppor (5)
- AdijeShen (2)
- smallwat3r (1)
- clach04 (1)
- WouterJanson (1)
- ATimmeh33 (1)
- restlessdesign (1)
- rm-code (1)