thesis
Towards Transparency and Open Science: A Principled Perspective on Computational Reproducibility and Preregistration
Science Score: 57.0%
This score indicates how likely this project is to be science-related based on various indicators:
-
✓CITATION.cff file
Found CITATION.cff file -
✓codemeta.json file
Found codemeta.json file -
✓.zenodo.json file
Found .zenodo.json file -
✓DOI references
Found 2 DOI reference(s) in README -
○Academic publication links
-
○Committers with academic emails
-
○Institutional organization owner
-
○JOSS paper metadata
-
○Scientific vocabulary similarity
Low similarity (2.5%) to scientific vocabulary
Keywords from Contributors
structural-equation-modeling
Last synced: 7 months ago
·
JSON representation
·
Repository
Towards Transparency and Open Science: A Principled Perspective on Computational Reproducibility and Preregistration
Basic Info
- Host: GitHub
- Owner: aaronpeikert
- License: cc0-1.0
- Language: R
- Default Branch: main
- Homepage: https://aaronpeikert.github.io/thesis/manuscript.pdf
- Size: 40.6 MB
Statistics
- Stars: 2
- Watchers: 1
- Forks: 0
- Open Issues: 7
- Releases: 8
Created over 3 years ago
· Last pushed almost 2 years ago
Metadata Files
Readme
License
Citation
README.Rmd
---
output: github_document
repro:
files:
- abstract.md
---
Peikert, A. (2023). Towards Transparency and Open Science: A Principled Perspective on Computational Reproducibility and Preregistration [Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin]. https://www.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7654989
## Abstract
```{r child='abstract.md'}
```
Owner
- Name: Aaron Peikert
- Login: aaronpeikert
- Kind: user
- Repositories: 15
- Profile: https://github.com/aaronpeikert
Citation (CITATION.cff)
# This CITATION.cff file was generated with cffinit.
# Visit https://bit.ly/cffinit to generate yours today!
cff-version: 1.2.0
title: >-
Towards Transparency and Open Science: A Principled
Perspective on Computational Reproducibility and
Preregistration
type: thesis
authors:
- given-names: Aaron
family-names: Peikert
email: peikert@mpib-berlin.mpg.de
affiliation: Max Planck Institute for Human Development
orcid: 'https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7813-818X'
identifiers:
- type: doi
value: 10.5281/zenodo.7654989
description: Zenodo
repository-code: 'https://github.com/aaronpeikert/thesis'
url: 'https://aaronpeikert.github.io/thesis/manuscript.pdf'
abstract: >-
Psychology and other empirical sciences are in the middle
of a crisis, as many researchers have become aware that
many findings do not have as much empirical support as
they once believed. Several causes of this crisis have
been suggested: misuse of statistical methods,
sociological biases, and weak theories. This dissertation
proposes the following rationale: to some extent,
imprecise theories are unavoidable, but they still can be
subjected to an empirical test by employing induction.
Data may be used to amend theories, allowing precise
predictions that can be compared to reality. However, such
a strategy comes at a cost. While induction is necessary,
it causes overconfidence in empirical findings. When
assessing findings, this overconfidence must be taken into
account. The extent of the overconfidence depends on the
properties of the inductive process. Some inductive
processes can be made fully transparent, so their bias can
be accounted for appropriately. I show that this is the
case for induction that can be repeated at will on other
data, highlighting the importance of computational
reproducibility. Induction involving the researcher and
their cognitive model can not be repeated; hence, the
extent of overconfidence must be judged with uncertainty.
I propose that reducing this uncertainty should be the
objective of preregistration. Having explicated the goals
of computational reproducibility and preregistration from
a perspective of transparency about induction in the
synopsis, I put forward recommendations for the practice
of both in the articles published as part of this
dissertation.
keywords:
- open science
- computational reproducibility
- preregistration
- exploration
- confirmation
- induction
- deduction
- psychology
- replication crisis
license: CC0-1.0
version: v1.0
date-released: '2023-02-23'
references:
- type: article
title: >-
A Reproducible Data Analysis Workflow With R Markdown, Git, Make, and Docker
doi: 10.5964/qcmb.3763
authors:
- given-names: Aaron
family-names: Peikert
email: peikert@mpib-berlin.mpg.de
name-particle: Aaron
orcid: 'https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7813-818X'
- given-names: Andreas M.
family-names: Brandmaier
orcid: 'https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8765-6982'
- type: article
title: >-
Reproducible Research in R: A Tutorial on How to Do the Same Thing More Than Once
doi: 10.3390/psych3040053
authors:
- given-names: Aaron
family-names: Peikert
email: peikert@mpib-berlin.mpg.de
name-particle: Aaron
affiliation: Max Planck Institute for Human Development
orcid: 'https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7813-818X'
- given-names: Caspar
name-particle: van
family-names: Lissa
orcid: 'https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0808-5024'
- given-names: Andreas M.
family-names: Brandmaier
orcid: 'https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8765-6982'
- type: article
title: >-
Why does preregistration increase the persuasiveness of evidence? A Bayesian rationalization
doi: 10.31234/osf.io/cs8wb
authors:
- given-names: Aaron
family-names: Peikert
email: peikert@mpib-berlin.mpg.de
name-particle: Aaron
affiliation: Max Planck Institute for Human Development
orcid: 'https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7813-818X'
- given-names: Caspar
name-particle: van
family-names: Lissa
orcid: 'https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0808-5024'
- given-names: Andreas M.
family-names: Brandmaier
orcid: 'https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8765-6982'
GitHub Events
Total
Last Year
Committers
Last synced: 9 months ago
Top Committers
| Name | Commits | |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron Peikert | a****t@p****e | 125 |
| leoniehagitte | 1****e | 80 |
Committer Domains (Top 20 + Academic)
posteo.de: 1
Issues and Pull Requests
Last synced: 9 months ago
All Time
- Total issues: 6
- Total pull requests: 7
- Average time to close issues: N/A
- Average time to close pull requests: about 18 hours
- Total issue authors: 2
- Total pull request authors: 2
- Average comments per issue: 0.0
- Average comments per pull request: 0.0
- Merged pull requests: 6
- Bot issues: 0
- Bot pull requests: 0
Past Year
- Issues: 0
- Pull requests: 0
- Average time to close issues: N/A
- Average time to close pull requests: N/A
- Issue authors: 0
- Pull request authors: 0
- Average comments per issue: 0
- Average comments per pull request: 0
- Merged pull requests: 0
- Bot issues: 0
- Bot pull requests: 0
Top Authors
Issue Authors
- LeonieHagitte (5)
- aaronpeikert (1)
Pull Request Authors
- aaronpeikert (4)
- LeonieHagitte (3)