Science Score: 44.0%
This score indicates how likely this project is to be science-related based on various indicators:
-
✓CITATION.cff file
Found CITATION.cff file -
✓codemeta.json file
Found codemeta.json file -
✓.zenodo.json file
Found .zenodo.json file -
○DOI references
-
○Academic publication links
-
○Academic email domains
-
○Institutional organization owner
-
○JOSS paper metadata
-
○Scientific vocabulary similarity
Low similarity (9.2%) to scientific vocabulary
Keywords
Repository
Deviance classification
Statistics
- Stars: 1
- Watchers: 0
- Forks: 0
- Open Issues: 0
- Releases: 0
Topics
Metadata Files
README.md
System Outliers
"There is no science without fancy and no art without fact." — Vladimir Nabokov
Purpose
To provide a classification grammar that distinguishes between types of deviance based on: recursive behavior, symbolic trace, and entropy/magnitude pressure—enabling systems (human or machine) to preserve structural outliers and correctly discard reactive ones.
Framework Goal: Provide a principled way to classify anomalies by structure, traceability, and compressibility, not just statistical deviation.
About
too structural for ML, too symbolic for physics, too dynamic for logic, and too interpretive for engineering
This framework does not exclude anomalies and instead provides a strucutre to prove when they aren't. It redefines anomaly classification from a position of distance to a question of entropy.
It extends concepts from:
- Opinion dynamics (H-K)
- Compression logic (Shannon)
- Recursive identity systems (Peirce, control theory)
- Grammar as behavior (structural linguistics)
Usage
Drop system-outliers-annie.txt into ChatGPT to explore framework.
Use ChatGPT to explore how the framework works.
GPT is faster with the framework because it externalizes deviance logic into structured classification mechanics by providing:
- A compressed decision surface (rules over heuristics),
- A recursion-visible signal trace,
- A bias-free deviance vector space.
This removes semantic negotiation, rhetorical padding, and output validation. Speed increases because structure replaces guesswork.
Framework
### Class types: - Structural: Recurring, traceable, high net entropy - Reactive: Forceful, disruptive, high net magnitude - Hybrid: Recurring near thresholds, context-sensitive - Residual: Non-random, unclassifiable, held
### Key rules: - tracelike = 1 if signal occurs in dominant system context - netmagnitude = |value - mean| - Structural = high netmagnitude + tracelike = 1 - Reactive = high netmagnitude + tracelike = 0 - Hybrid = trace_like = 1 + moderate magnitude
### Behavior: - Avoid premature naming, preserve recursion - Classify based on signal behavior: noun (anchor), verb (rupture), adjective (modifier) - Do not filter outliers—interpret how they stress or preserve the system
- Track recursion fidelity and symbolic displacement feedback (SDF)
Acknowledgment
This framework was shaped in part by the tone and structure of A General Theory of Love (Lewis, 2000), it models a rare epistemic balance by honoring scientific structure without reducing human systems and introducing symbolic coherence without overwriting emotional complexity.
Developed collaboratively through recursive interaction with ChatGPT.
License
Owner
- Login: nntrn
- Kind: user
- Location: Austin, TX
- Repositories: 11
- Profile: https://github.com/nntrn
kinda cool kinda nerdy
Citation (CITATION.cff)
cff-version: 1.2.0
title: System Outliers
message: If you use this software, please cite it as below.
authors:
- family-names: Tran
given-names: Annie
orcid: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7398-832X
date-released: '2025-07-02'
license: CC-BY-4.0
version: 1.0.0
url: https://github.com/nntrn/system-outliers
GitHub Events
Total
- Watch event: 1
- Delete event: 1
- Push event: 3
- Public event: 1
- Create event: 1
Last Year
- Watch event: 1
- Delete event: 1
- Push event: 3
- Public event: 1
- Create event: 1
