% This file was created with JabRef 2.5.
% Encoding: Cp1252

@inproceedings{Ferratt:2010:TSD:1796900.1796963,
 author = {Ferratt, Thomas W. and Mai, Bin},
 title = {Tailoring Software Development},
 booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2010 Special Interest Group on Management Information System's 48th Annual Conference on Computer Personnel Research on Computer Personnel Research},
 series = {SIGMIS-CPR '10},
 year = {2010},
 isbn = {978-1-4503-0004-9},
 location = {Vancouver, BC, Canada},
 pages = {165--170},
 numpages = {6},
 url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1796900.1796963},
 doi = {10.1145/1796900.1796963},
 acmid = {1796963},
 publisher = {ACM},
 address = {New York, NY, USA},
 keywords = {adjusting project budget, aligning software processes with strategy, and quality, configurable development processes, factors affecting tailoring, managing software projects, modifying project goals and constraints, process line, schedule, tailoring by stage},
}

@article{Zuser:2005:SQD:1082983.1083300,
 author = {Zuser, Wolfgang and Heil, Stefan and Grechenig, Thomas},
 title = {Software Quality Development and Assurance in RUP, MSF and XP: A Comparative Study},
 journal = {SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes},
 issue_date = {July 2005},
 volume = {30},
 number = {4},
 month = may,
 year = {2005},
 issn = {0163-5948},
 pages = {1--6},
 numpages = {6},
 url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1082983.1083300},
 doi = {10.1145/1082983.1083300},
 acmid = {1083300},
 publisher = {ACM},
 address = {New York, NY, USA},
 keywords = {software process models, software quality assurance, software quality development},
} 


@inproceedings{Shihab:2011:PPS:1985793.1986007,
 author = {Shihab, Emad},
 title = {Pragmatic Prioritization of Software Quality Assurance Efforts},
 booktitle = {Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering},
 series = {ICSE '11},
 year = {2011},
 isbn = {978-1-4503-0445-0},
 location = {Waikiki, Honolulu, HI, USA},
 pages = {1106--1109},
 numpages = {4},
 url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1985793.1986007},
 doi = {10.1145/1985793.1986007},
 acmid = {1986007},
 publisher = {ACM},
 address = {New York, NY, USA},
 keywords = {change risk, software metrics, unit testing},
}

@inproceedings{Mnkandla:2006:DAS:1193212.1193806,
 author = {Mnkandla, E. and Dwolatzky, B.},
 title = {Defining Agile Software Quality Assurance},
 booktitle = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering Advances},
 series = {ICSEA '06},
 year = {2006},
 isbn = {0-7695-2703-5},
 pages = {36--},
 url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICSEA.2006.30},
 doi = {10.1109/ICSEA.2006.30},
 acmid = {1193806},
 publisher = {IEEE Computer Society},
 address = {Washington, DC, USA},
 keywords = {Agile methodologies, agile quality assurance, software development, software quality.},
} 

@book{Jones:2011:ESQ:2025240,
 author = {Jones, Capers and Bonsignour, Olivier},
 title = {The Economics of Software Quality},
 year = {2011},
 isbn = {0132582201, 9780132582209},
 edition = {1st},
 publisher = {Addison-Wesley Professional},
}

@inproceedings{Alsultanny:2009:RSQ:1725036.1726230,
 author = {Alsultanny, Yas A. and Wohaishi, Ahmed M.},
 title = {Requirements of Software Quality Assurance Model},
 booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2009 Second International Conference on Environmental and Computer Science},
 series = {ICECS '09},
 year = {2009},
 isbn = {978-0-7695-3937-9},
 pages = {19--23},
 numpages = {5},
 url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICECS.2009.43},
 doi = {10.1109/ICECS.2009.43},
 acmid = {1726230},
 publisher = {IEEE Computer Society},
 address = {Washington, DC, USA},
 keywords = {component, software quality, software complexity, ISO},
} 

@article{Abdel-Hamid:1988:ESQ:59189.59192,
 author = {Abdel-Hamid, Tarek K.},
 title = {The Economics of Software Quality Assurance: A Simulation-based Case Study},
 journal = {MIS Q.},
 issue_date = {Sept. 1988},
 volume = {12},
 number = {3},
 month = sep,
 year = {1988},
 issn = {0276-7783},
 pages = {395--411},
 numpages = {17},
 url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249206},
 doi = {10.2307/249206},
 acmid = {59192},
 publisher = {Society for Information Management and The Management Information Systems Research Center},
 address = {Minneapolis, MN, USA},
}

@INPROCEEDINGS{6093459, 
author={Gu Hongying and Yang Cheng}, 
booktitle={Information Science and Service Science (NISS), 2011 5th International Conference on New Trends in}, 
title={A customizable agile software Quality Assurance model}, 
year={2011}, 
month={Oct}, 
volume={2}, 
pages={382-387}, 
keywords={quality assurance;software prototyping;software quality;AQAM;QA capability;agile software development teams;customizable agile software quality assurance model;software development process;software industry;Best practices;Capability maturity model;Guidelines;Organizations;Programming;Testing;Key Process Area;Process Model;Quality Assurance},}

@article{jones2007anatomy,
  title={The anatomy of a design theory},
  author={Jones, David and Gregor, Shirley},
  journal={Journal of the Association for Information Systems},
  volume={8},
  number={5},
  pages={1},
  year={2007}
}

@misc{Pustovalova2011,
author = {Pustovalova, Natalja and Bakaev, Maxim},
booktitle = {Novosibirsk State Technical University, Department of Economic Informatics},
pages = {7},
title = {{Knowledge-Based System for Software Requirements Analysis and Management | Maxim Bakaev - Academia.edu}},
url = {http://www.academia.edu/929713/Knowledge-Based\_System\_for\_Software\_Requirements\_Analysis\_and\_Management},
urldate = {09/08/14},
year = {2011}
}

@misc{Infosys20011,
author = {InfosysLtd.},
booktitle = {Realizing Efficiency \& Effectiveness in Software
Testing through a Comprehensive Metrics Model},
pages = {24},
title = {{ealizing Efficiency \& Effectiveness in Software
Testing through a Comprehensive Metrics Model}}
url = {http://www.infosys.com/engineering-services/white-papers/Documents/comprehensive-metrics-model.pdf},
urldate = {09/08/14},
year = {2011}
}

@article{tomar2013customized,
  title={A Customized Model on Software Quality Assurance \& Reuse},
  author={Tomar, Ashwin and Thakare, VM},
  journal={International Journal Of Computer Science And Applications},
  volume={6},
  number={2},
  year={2013}
}

@article{zahra2013efficient,
  title={An Efficient and Effective New Generation Objective Quality Model for Mobile Applications},
  author={Zahra, Sobia and Khalid, Asra and Javed, Ali},
  journal={International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science (IJMECS)},
  volume={5},
  number={4},
  pages={36},
  year={2013}
}

@inproceedings{ejaz2010quality,
  title={A quality assurance model for analysis phase},
  author={Ejaz, Reham and Nazmeen, Mubina and Zafar, Maryam},
  booktitle={Proceedings of the 2010 National Software Engineering Conference},
  pages={1},
  year={2010},
  organization={ACM}
}


@misc{Nikolik2012,
abstract = {Context $\backslash$nSoftware companies invest in quality assurance in order to lower software development and maintenance cost, and to increase revenue and profit margins. To contribute to increase of net income, a quality assurance organization has to consider cost and value of the testware involved in assuring quality of software artifacts, such as requirements, specifications, designs, and code. $\backslash$nObjective $\backslash$nThis paper proposes a set of economic metrics: testware return on investment, inflation, and cost and value sensitivity to artifact changes and time passage. The paper proposes a set of guidelines on lowering testware cost, on increasing value, on maximizing return on investment, and on when to release. $\backslash$nMethod $\backslash$nThis paper presents an industrial case study data on the relation between test case cost and value, and on cost and value sensitivity to time passage and artifact changes. $\backslash$nResults $\backslash$nThe industrial case study showed return on investment on test cases of up to 200\%, deflation of up to −2\% per month, undesirable economic effects, such as test case cost outpacing test case value and rapid test case value depreciation based on time passage. $\backslash$nConclusion $\backslash$nA viable QA organization should measure and improve test case return on investment, inflation, and cost and value sensitivity to artifact changes and time passage.},
annote = {konnte es nicht downloaden/kaufen},
author = {Nikolik, Borislav},
booktitle = {Information and Software Technology},
doi = {10.1016/j.infsof.2012.06.003},
issn = {09505849},
number = {11},
pages = {1229--1238},
title = {{Software quality assurance economics}},
volume = {54},
year = {2012}
}

@article{marri2001models,
  title={Models for evaluating review effectiveness},
  author={Marri, KiranKumar and Center, Product Competency},
  year={2001}
}

@misc{RaismanAliDouglasGabbyWieberJordynRoss, 
annote = {Target Field citation}, 
author = {{Raisman, Ali, Douglas Gabby, Wieber, Jordyn, Ross}, Kyla}, 
keywords = {Ali Raisman,CEO Network,Entrepreneurs,Gabby Douglas,Jordyn Wieber,Kyla Ross,Leaders,Leadership,McKayla Maroney,generalists,gymnastics,olympics,role sort,specialists}, 
title = {{When to Hire Generalists vs. Specialists: Lessons from the Fab Five - Forbes}}, 
url = {http://www.forbes.com/sites/georgebradt/2012/08/10/us-womens-olympics-gymnastics-team-lessons-re-generalists-vs-specialist/}, 
urldate = {02/08/14} 
}