medresearch

A research document exploring the medical imaging field and the potential available data formats out there.

https://github.com/divital-coder/medresearch

Science Score: 41.0%

This score indicates how likely this project is to be science-related based on various indicators:

  • CITATION.cff file
    Found CITATION.cff file
  • codemeta.json file
    Found codemeta.json file
  • .zenodo.json file
  • DOI references
  • Academic publication links
    Links to: nature.com, frontiersin.org
  • Committers with academic emails
  • Institutional organization owner
  • JOSS paper metadata
  • Scientific vocabulary similarity
    Low similarity (10.2%) to scientific vocabulary
Last synced: 10 months ago · JSON representation ·

Repository

A research document exploring the medical imaging field and the potential available data formats out there.

Basic Info
  • Host: GitHub
  • Owner: divital-coder
  • License: other
  • Default Branch: main
  • Size: 81.8 MB
Statistics
  • Stars: 1
  • Watchers: 1
  • Forks: 0
  • Open Issues: 0
  • Releases: 0
Created over 2 years ago · Last pushed over 2 years ago
Metadata Files
Readme Citation

README.md

MedResearch

A research document exploring the medical imaging field and the potential available data formats out there.

tech : Latex, for maintaining references bibtex The following table will be embedded within the research : Abstract Introduction (biology information -> computational Biology -> literature review(2020-2024 papers) -> approaches - > technical strides ) Problem Statement (Write, based on the given literature ) Objective Proposed Framework discusion for implementation of future work conclusion, future work

TABLE: paper number authors of paper objective implementation strategy effectiveness of implementation

Research paper sites : Nature journal, Frontiers, ArXIV, ResearchGate , mdpi, pubmed, ScienceDirect,

https://www.nature.com https://www.frontiersin.org/about/research-topics

Mentions: abstract introduction literature survey -> background - > literature survey various existing medical imaging data formats : dicom , nifti , analyze, minc, nrrd and hdf5 Working with nifti files with the help of nibabel and ITK Medical image data augmentations : augmenting original data generating synthetic dataset based on machine learning models. technical strides and approaches Problem statement Current Implementation within julia / objective proposed framework future work conclusion

User what is a literature review in a research paper ChatGPT

A literature review is a critical and systematic summary and evaluation of existing research on a particular topic within a research paper. It serves several purposes within the context of a research study:

Contextualization: It provides a background for the research by placing it within the context of previous studies and theoretical frameworks. This helps readers understand the evolution of the topic and the gaps in existing knowledge.

Identification of Gaps: By reviewing the existing literature, researchers can identify gaps, controversies, or areas where further research is needed. This helps in shaping the research questions and objectives of the current study.

Theoretical Framework: It helps establish the theoretical framework for the study by drawing on relevant theories and concepts from existing literature. This theoretical foundation guides the research design and analysis.

Methodological Insight: Literature reviews often discuss the methodologies employed in previous studies. Researchers can learn from the strengths and limitations of these methods and make informed decisions about their own research design.

Critical Evaluation: A literature review involves critically analyzing the quality and findings of previous research. This evaluation helps researchers assess the reliability and validity of existing studies and informs the interpretation of their own results.

Synthesis of Information: It involves synthesizing information from various sources to present a coherent and comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge on the topic. This synthesis helps in building a strong argument for the research study.

Citations and Academic Integrity: Including a literature review demonstrates that the research is building upon existing scholarly work. Proper citations are crucial for acknowledging the contributions of other researchers and maintaining academic integrity.

The structure of a literature review typically involves organizing and presenting the reviewed literature thematically, chronologically, or methodologically, depending on the goals of the research and the preferences of the author. A well-conducted literature review enhances the credibility and validity of the research by showing that the study is grounded in a thorough understanding of the existing body of knowledge.

The number of research papers you should explore within a literature review can vary based on several factors, including the scope of your research, the depth of the literature on your topic, and the requirements or guidelines provided by your academic institution or publisher. There's no fixed number that applies universally, as the goal is to achieve a comprehensive understanding of the existing literature.

Here are some general guidelines to consider:

Scope and Depth of the Topic: If your research is on a broad topic with a vast body of literature, you may need to review a larger number of papers. On the other hand, if your topic is more specific or niche, a smaller number of key papers might suffice.

Requirements from Institution or Publisher: Check the guidelines provided by your institution, department, or the publisher of the research paper. Some institutions may specify a minimum or maximum number of sources, while others may emphasize the importance of focusing on recent and high-impact publications.

Quality over Quantity: It's crucial to prioritize the quality of the sources over sheer quantity. A well-selected set of high-quality, relevant papers can be more effective than a larger number of less relevant ones.

Recent and Classic Works: Include a mix of recent research papers to show the current state of the field and classic or foundational works that have shaped the understanding of the topic over time.

Variety of Perspectives: Try to include a variety of perspectives, methodologies, and findings within your review. This demonstrates a nuanced understanding of the topic and acknowledges the diversity of research in the field.

Thematic Organization: Organize your literature review thematically or conceptually. This allows you to group related studies and present a cohesive narrative rather than simply listing individual papers.

Remember that the goal of a literature review is not just to list all available papers but to provide a critical synthesis of the existing knowledge and identify gaps or areas where your research can contribute. Discuss your plan with your advisor or colleagues to get specific guidance tailored to your research context.

explore minimum 20 research papers for literature review

BEST ENGINE FOR RESEARCHING ACADEMIC PAPERS : https://oa.mg/journals/open-access-quantum-mechanics-journals

Owner

  • Name: hurtbadly
  • Login: divital-coder
  • Kind: user
  • Location: India

Incredibly influential entrepreneur, deeply in love with software technology, willing to code the world's first photorealistic metaverse!

Citation (citation-366147152.txt)

Garcea, Fabio & Serra, Alessio & Lamberti, F. & Morra, Lia. (2022). Data augmentation for medical imaging: A systematic literature review. Computers in Biology and Medicine. 152. 106391. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106391. Recent advances in Deep Learning have largely benefited from larger and more diverse training sets. However, collecting large datasets for medical imaging is still a challenge due to privacy concerns and labeling costs. Data augmentation makes it possible to greatly expand the amount and variety of data available for training without actually collecting new samples. Data augmentation techniques range from simple yet surprisingly effective transformations such as cropping, padding, and flipping, to complex generative models. Depending on the nature of the input and the visual task, different data augmentation strategies are likely to perform differently. For this reason, it is conceivable that medical imaging requires specific augmentation strategies that generate plausible data samples and enable effective regularization of deep neural networks. Data augmentation can also be used to augment specific classes that are underrepresented in the training set, e.g., to generate artificial lesions. The goal of this systematic literature review is to investigate which data augmentation strategies are used in the medical domain and how they affect the performance of clinical tasks such as classification, segmentation, and lesion detection. To this end, a comprehensive analysis of more than 300 articles published in recent years (2018–2022) was conducted. The results highlight the effectiveness of data augmentation across organs, modalities, tasks, and dataset sizes, and suggest potential avenues for future research.

GitHub Events

Total
Last Year

Committers

Last synced: over 1 year ago

All Time
  • Total Commits: 33
  • Total Committers: 2
  • Avg Commits per committer: 16.5
  • Development Distribution Score (DDS): 0.03
Past Year
  • Commits: 0
  • Committers: 0
  • Avg Commits per committer: 0.0
  • Development Distribution Score (DDS): 0.0
Top Committers
Name Email Commits
Divyansh Goyal d****4@g****m 32
hurtbadly d****4@g****m 1

Issues and Pull Requests

Last synced: over 1 year ago

All Time
  • Total issues: 0
  • Total pull requests: 0
  • Average time to close issues: N/A
  • Average time to close pull requests: N/A
  • Total issue authors: 0
  • Total pull request authors: 0
  • Average comments per issue: 0
  • Average comments per pull request: 0
  • Merged pull requests: 0
  • Bot issues: 0
  • Bot pull requests: 0
Past Year
  • Issues: 0
  • Pull requests: 0
  • Average time to close issues: N/A
  • Average time to close pull requests: N/A
  • Issue authors: 0
  • Pull request authors: 0
  • Average comments per issue: 0
  • Average comments per pull request: 0
  • Merged pull requests: 0
  • Bot issues: 0
  • Bot pull requests: 0
Top Authors
Issue Authors
Pull Request Authors
Top Labels
Issue Labels
Pull Request Labels