smart-criteria

SMART criteria for goals, objectives, plans, etc.

https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/smart-criteria

Science Score: 44.0%

This score indicates how likely this project is to be science-related based on various indicators:

  • CITATION.cff file
    Found CITATION.cff file
  • codemeta.json file
    Found codemeta.json file
  • .zenodo.json file
    Found .zenodo.json file
  • DOI references
  • Academic publication links
  • Committers with academic emails
  • Institutional organization owner
  • JOSS paper metadata
  • Scientific vocabulary similarity
    Low similarity (9.2%) to scientific vocabulary
Last synced: 8 months ago · JSON representation ·

Repository

SMART criteria for goals, objectives, plans, etc.

Basic Info
  • Host: GitHub
  • Owner: joelparkerhenderson
  • Default Branch: main
  • Homepage:
  • Size: 8.79 KB
Statistics
  • Stars: 22
  • Watchers: 2
  • Forks: 4
  • Open Issues: 0
  • Releases: 0
Created over 8 years ago · Last pushed 9 months ago
Metadata Files
Readme Code of conduct Citation

README.md

SMART criteria

SMART criteria for goals, objectives, plans, tasks, etc.:

  • Specific: target one area clearly and precisely.
  • Measurable: quantify progress toward success by using metrics.
  • Achievable: able to start, able to continue, and able to accomplish.
  • Relevant: closely connected to what's happening and being considered.
  • Timely: occurring at a favorable or useful time and opportune.

Wikipedia: SMART critera

SMARTER criteria adds two letters:

  • Evaluate: examine the work in progress and after, to adjust as needed.
  • Reward: Recognize success, acknowledge achievements.

Related FAST criteria:

  • Frequently discussed: shape the key discussions for getting work done.
  • Ambitious: intended to satisfy high aspirations and challenging to achieve.
  • Specific: target one area clearly and precisely.
  • Transparent: open, clear, and shared with the team and organization.

Specific

Target one area clearly and precisely.

Questions that may help:

  • Scope: What is in scope versus out of scope?
  • Functionality: What are the inputs, processes, and outputs?
  • Understanding: What is the terminology, ubiquitous language, etc.?
  • Results: What are any objectives, outcomes, impacts?
  • Phrasing: Can you use positive phrases and action verbs?

Alternatives:

  • Strategic: relating to the identification of long-term or overall aims and interests and the means of achieving them.

Measurable

Quantify progress toward success by using metrics.

Questions that may help:

  • What metrics are being used and why?
  • How do measurements help manage the work and improve it?
  • What are the key performance indicators?
  • What are any leading indicators and lagging indicators?
  • How do various stakeholders access the metrics?

Alternatives:

  • Motivating: stimulate interest in, or enthusiasm for, doing something.

Achievable

Able to start, able to continue, and able to accomplish.

Questions that may help:

  • Who is working on this? List any roles, responsibilities, participants, etc.
  • What resources are needed? List any inputs, dependencies, materials, etc.
  • How are the challenges? List any risks, assumptions, constraints, etc.

Alternatives:

  • Actionable: ready to start and possible to accomplish.
  • Accomplishable, Attainable: can be successfully completed.
  • Assignable: can be given to a person or team who are responsible.
  • Agreed: discussed or negotiated and then accepted by all parties.
  • Action-oriented: willing or likely to take practical action to deal with a problem or situation.
  • Ambitious: intended to satisfy high aspirations and challenging to achieve.
  • Aligned: coming together in agreement or alliance.

Relevant

Closely connected to what's happening and being considered.

Questions that may help:

  • Can you summarize the purpose, rationale, etc.?
  • Can you summarize the context, connections, etc.?
  • How does this relate to the participants, their roles, and goals?
  • How does this interconnect with other work, such as positively or negatively?

Alternatives:

  • Relatable: able to be shown or established to have a causal or logical connection to something.
  • Realistic: having or showing a sensible and practical idea of what can be achieved or expected.
  • Resourced: provided with materials, money, staff, and other assets necessary for effective operation.
  • Reasonable: sensible, appropriate, and fair.
  • Results-based: focused on valuable outcomes.

Timely

Occurring at a favorable or useful time and opportune.

Questions that may help:

  • When is this happening?
  • Why is the timing important?
  • Where can participants see a timeline, or calendar, or schedule, etc.?
  • Is there anything important that happens before this or after this?

Alternatives:

  • Trackable: can be tracked, or monitored, or analyzed.
  • Time-based, time-bound, time-boxed, time-limited: for a specified amount time.
  • Time-sensitive: has to be done by a particular time, or in a particular period.
  • Timeframe: a period of time, especially a specified period in which something happens.
  • Testable: able to be tested or tried.
  • Transparent: open, clear, and shared with the team and organization.

Evaluate

Examine the work progress, the participants' performance, and changes over time, and adjust as needed.

Questions that may help:

  • What are lessons learned, both during the work and after it?
  • What changes are possible, or recommended, during the work and after it?
  • How do the participants update their SMART criteria during work in progress?

Alternatives:

  • Examine: look at something carefully in order to make judgments.
  • Edit: make changes to something in order to improve it.

Reward

Recognize success, acknowledge achievements.

Questions that may help:

  • When milestones are reached, what kinds of rewards will be given?
  • Do participants have any ideas for rewards, or preferred rewards?
  • What are comparable rewards for similar work at other organizations?

Alternatives:

  • Reviewed: examined, or inspected, or approved.
  • Retrospective: able to be looked back on, such as for lessons learned, or continuous improvement, etc.

Owner

  • Name: Joel Parker Henderson
  • Login: joelparkerhenderson
  • Kind: user
  • Location: California

Software developer. Technology consultant. Creator of GitAlias.com, NumCommand.com, SixArm.com, and many open source projects.

Citation (CITATION.cff)

cff-version: 1.2.0
title: SMART criteria
message: >-
  If you use this work and you want to cite it,
  then you can use the metadata from this file.
type: software
authors:
  - given-names: Joel Parker
    family-names: Henderson
    email: joel@joelparkerhenderson.com
    affiliation: joelparkerhenderson.com
    orcid: 'https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4681-282X'
identifiers:
  - type: url
    value: 'https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/smart-criteria/'
    description: SMART criteria
repository-code: 'https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/smart-criteria/'
abstract: >-
  SMART criteria
license: See license file

GitHub Events

Total
  • Watch event: 2
  • Push event: 8
Last Year
  • Watch event: 2
  • Push event: 8

Committers

Last synced: over 1 year ago

All Time
  • Total Commits: 11
  • Total Committers: 1
  • Avg Commits per committer: 11.0
  • Development Distribution Score (DDS): 0.0
Past Year
  • Commits: 5
  • Committers: 1
  • Avg Commits per committer: 5.0
  • Development Distribution Score (DDS): 0.0
Top Committers
Name Email Commits
Joel Parker Henderson j****l@j****m 11
Committer Domains (Top 20 + Academic)

Issues and Pull Requests

Last synced: about 1 year ago

All Time
  • Total issues: 0
  • Total pull requests: 0
  • Average time to close issues: N/A
  • Average time to close pull requests: N/A
  • Total issue authors: 0
  • Total pull request authors: 0
  • Average comments per issue: 0
  • Average comments per pull request: 0
  • Merged pull requests: 0
  • Bot issues: 0
  • Bot pull requests: 0
Past Year
  • Issues: 0
  • Pull requests: 0
  • Average time to close issues: N/A
  • Average time to close pull requests: N/A
  • Issue authors: 0
  • Pull request authors: 0
  • Average comments per issue: 0
  • Average comments per pull request: 0
  • Merged pull requests: 0
  • Bot issues: 0
  • Bot pull requests: 0
Top Authors
Issue Authors
Pull Request Authors
Top Labels
Issue Labels
Pull Request Labels