Science Score: 44.0%

This score indicates how likely this project is to be science-related based on various indicators:

  • CITATION.cff file
    Found CITATION.cff file
  • codemeta.json file
    Found codemeta.json file
  • .zenodo.json file
  • DOI references
    Found 10 DOI reference(s) in README
  • Academic publication links
  • Committers with academic emails
  • Institutional organization owner
  • JOSS paper metadata
  • Scientific vocabulary similarity
    Low similarity (11.5%) to scientific vocabulary
Last synced: 6 months ago · JSON representation ·

Repository

Basic Info
  • Host: GitHub
  • Owner: remiolsen
  • License: mit
  • Language: Nextflow
  • Default Branch: main
  • Size: 2.07 MB
Statistics
  • Stars: 0
  • Watchers: 2
  • Forks: 1
  • Open Issues: 0
  • Releases: 0
Created almost 5 years ago · Last pushed almost 5 years ago
Metadata Files
Readme Changelog Contributing License Code of conduct Citation

README.md

nf-core/hicscaff

GitHub Actions CI Status GitHub Actions Linting Status AWS CI Cite with Zenodo

Nextflow run with conda run with docker run with singularity

Get help on Slack Follow on Twitter Watch on YouTube

Introduction

nf-core/hicscaff is a bioinformatics best-practice analysis pipeline for Pre-processing of Hi-C data for de novo genome scaffolding experiments.

The pipeline is built using Nextflow, a workflow tool to run tasks across multiple compute infrastructures in a very portable manner. It uses Docker / Singularity containers making installation trivial and results highly reproducible.

On release, automated continuous integration tests run the pipeline on a full-sized dataset on the AWS cloud infrastructure. This ensures that the pipeline runs on AWS, has sensible resource allocation defaults set to run on real-world datasets, and permits the persistent storage of results to benchmark between pipeline releases and other analysis sources. The results obtained from the full-sized test can be viewed on the nf-core website.

Pipeline summary

  1. Read QC (FastQC)
  2. Present QC for raw reads (MultiQC)

Quick Start

  1. Install nextflow

  2. Install any of Docker, Singularity, Podman, Shifter or Charliecloud for full pipeline reproducibility (please only use Conda as a last resort; see docs)

  3. Download the pipeline and test it on a minimal dataset with a single command:

    bash nextflow run nf-core/hicscaff -profile test,<docker/singularity/podman/shifter/charliecloud/conda/institute>

* Please check [nf-core/configs](https://github.com/nf-core/configs#documentation) to see if a custom config file to run nf-core pipelines already exists for your Institute. If so, you can simply use `-profile <institute>` in your command. This will enable either `docker` or `singularity` and set the appropriate execution settings for your local compute environment.
* If you are using `singularity` then the pipeline will auto-detect this and attempt to download the Singularity images directly as opposed to performing a conversion from Docker images. If you are persistently observing issues downloading Singularity images directly due to timeout or network issues then please use the `--singularity_pull_docker_container` parameter to pull and convert the Docker image instead. It is also highly recommended to use the [`NXF_SINGULARITY_CACHEDIR` or `singularity.cacheDir`](https://www.nextflow.io/docs/latest/singularity.html?#singularity-docker-hub) settings to store the images in a central location for future pipeline runs.
* If you are using `conda`, it is highly recommended to use the [`NXF_CONDA_CACHEDIR` or `conda.cacheDir`](https://www.nextflow.io/docs/latest/conda.html) settings to store the environments in a central location for future pipeline runs.
  1. Start running your own analysis!

    bash nextflow run nf-core/hicscaff -profile <docker/singularity/podman/shifter/charliecloud/conda/institute> --input samplesheet.csv --genome GRCh37

See usage docs for all of the available options when running the pipeline.

Documentation

The nf-core/hicscaff pipeline comes with documentation about the pipeline: usage and output.

Credits

nf-core/hicscaff was originally written by Remi-Andre Olsen remi-andre.olsen@scilifelab.se.

We thank the following people for their extensive assistance in the development of this pipeline:

Contributions and Support

If you would like to contribute to this pipeline, please see the contributing guidelines.

For further information or help, don't hesitate to get in touch on the Slack #hicscaff channel (you can join with this invite).

Citations

An extensive list of references for the tools used by the pipeline can be found in the CITATIONS.md file.

You can cite the nf-core publication as follows:

The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines.

Philip Ewels, Alexander Peltzer, Sven Fillinger, Harshil Patel, Johannes Alneberg, Andreas Wilm, Maxime Ulysse Garcia, Paolo Di Tommaso & Sven Nahnsen.

Nat Biotechnol. 2020 Feb 13. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0439-x.

Owner

  • Name: Remi-Andre Olsen
  • Login: remiolsen
  • Kind: user
  • Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Citation (CITATIONS.md)

# nf-core/hicscaff: Citations

## [nf-core](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32055031/)

> Ewels PA, Peltzer A, Fillinger S, Patel H, Alneberg J, Wilm A, Garcia MU, Di Tommaso P, Nahnsen S. The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines. Nat Biotechnol. 2020 Mar;38(3):276-278. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0439-x. PubMed PMID: 32055031.

## [Nextflow](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28398311/)

> Di Tommaso P, Chatzou M, Floden EW, Barja PP, Palumbo E, Notredame C. Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows. Nat Biotechnol. 2017 Apr 11;35(4):316-319. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3820. PubMed PMID: 28398311.

## Pipeline tools

* [FastQC](https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/)

* [MultiQC](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27312411/)
  > Ewels P, Magnusson M, Lundin S, Käller M. MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics. 2016 Oct 1;32(19):3047-8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354. Epub 2016 Jun 16. PubMed PMID: 27312411; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5039924.

## Software packaging/containerisation tools

* [Anaconda](https://anaconda.com)
  > Anaconda Software Distribution. Computer software. Vers. 2-2.4.0. Anaconda, Nov. 2016. Web.

* [Bioconda](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29967506/)
  > Grüning B, Dale R, Sjödin A, Chapman BA, Rowe J, Tomkins-Tinch CH, Valieris R, Köster J; Bioconda Team. Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences. Nat Methods. 2018 Jul;15(7):475-476. doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0046-7. PubMed PMID: 29967506.

* [BioContainers](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28379341/)
  > da Veiga Leprevost F, Grüning B, Aflitos SA, Röst HL, Uszkoreit J, Barsnes H, Vaudel M, Moreno P, Gatto L, Weber J, Bai M, Jimenez RC, Sachsenberg T, Pfeuffer J, Alvarez RV, Griss J, Nesvizhskii AI, Perez-Riverol Y. BioContainers: an open-source and community-driven framework for software standardization. Bioinformatics. 2017 Aug 15;33(16):2580-2582. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx192. PubMed PMID: 28379341; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5870671.

* [Docker](https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2600239.2600241)

* [Singularity](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28494014/)
  > Kurtzer GM, Sochat V, Bauer MW. Singularity: Scientific containers for mobility of compute. PLoS One. 2017 May 11;12(5):e0177459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177459. eCollection 2017. PubMed PMID: 28494014; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5426675.

GitHub Events

Total
Last Year

Committers

Last synced: about 1 year ago

All Time
  • Total Commits: 2
  • Total Committers: 1
  • Avg Commits per committer: 2.0
  • Development Distribution Score (DDS): 0.0
Past Year
  • Commits: 0
  • Committers: 0
  • Avg Commits per committer: 0.0
  • Development Distribution Score (DDS): 0.0
Top Committers
Name Email Commits
Remi-Andre Olsen r****n@s****e 2
Committer Domains (Top 20 + Academic)

Issues and Pull Requests

Last synced: about 1 year ago

All Time
  • Total issues: 0
  • Total pull requests: 0
  • Average time to close issues: N/A
  • Average time to close pull requests: N/A
  • Total issue authors: 0
  • Total pull request authors: 0
  • Average comments per issue: 0
  • Average comments per pull request: 0
  • Merged pull requests: 0
  • Bot issues: 0
  • Bot pull requests: 0
Past Year
  • Issues: 0
  • Pull requests: 0
  • Average time to close issues: N/A
  • Average time to close pull requests: N/A
  • Issue authors: 0
  • Pull request authors: 0
  • Average comments per issue: 0
  • Average comments per pull request: 0
  • Merged pull requests: 0
  • Bot issues: 0
  • Bot pull requests: 0
Top Authors
Issue Authors
Pull Request Authors
Top Labels
Issue Labels
Pull Request Labels