rtk-gnss_refractometry_swe

Snow water equivalent estimation based on RTK-GNSS refractometry up-component bias, using Emlid Reach M2 .ENU baseline files

https://github.com/lasteine/rtk-gnss_refractometry_swe

Science Score: 57.0%

This score indicates how likely this project is to be science-related based on various indicators:

  • CITATION.cff file
    Found CITATION.cff file
  • codemeta.json file
    Found codemeta.json file
  • .zenodo.json file
    Found .zenodo.json file
  • DOI references
    Found 2 DOI reference(s) in README
  • Academic publication links
  • Committers with academic emails
  • Institutional organization owner
  • JOSS paper metadata
  • Scientific vocabulary similarity
    Low similarity (5.7%) to scientific vocabulary

Keywords

gnss rtk snow swe
Last synced: 6 months ago · JSON representation ·

Repository

Snow water equivalent estimation based on RTK-GNSS refractometry up-component bias, using Emlid Reach M2 .ENU baseline files

Basic Info
  • Host: GitHub
  • Owner: lasteine
  • License: cc0-1.0
  • Language: Python
  • Default Branch: main
  • Homepage:
  • Size: 1.43 MB
Statistics
  • Stars: 4
  • Watchers: 2
  • Forks: 0
  • Open Issues: 0
  • Releases: 0
Topics
gnss rtk snow swe
Created almost 4 years ago · Last pushed over 2 years ago
Metadata Files
Readme License Citation

README.md

RTK-GNSSRefractometrySWE

Snow water equivalent (SWE) estimation based on RTK-GNSS (real-time-kinematic Global navigation satellite system).

The biased up-component of a short GNSS baseline between a base antenna (mounted on a pole) and a rover antenna (mounted underneath the snowpack) is used in this approach. Emlid Reach M2 receivers are used in a field setup, connected to ublox ANN-MB1 multi-frequency and multi-GNSS antennas. The receivers are set-up in RTK mode (base and rover settings) and the baseline vector (in ENU: East, North, Up) is logged by the receiver and stored in a .ENU file.

The python script contains a workflow from .ENU solution files reading to filtered and plotted SWE timeseries.

The method follows Steiner et al. (2020, 2022):

Steiner, L.; Studemann, G.; Grimm, D.; Marty, C.; Leinss, S. (Near) Real-Time Snow Water Equivalent Observation Using GNSS Refractometry and RTKLib. 2022, submitted to Sensors.

L. Steiner, M. Meindl, C. Marty and A. Geiger, "Impact of GPS Processing on the Estimation of Snow Water Equivalent Using Refracted GPS Signals," in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 123-135, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2934016.

Example data is publicly available on:

Studemann, G.; Marty, C.; Steiner, L.; Grimm, D. GNSS refractometry data from Davos Laret, Switzerland in 2021/22. Zenodo, 2022. embargoed until January 2023, doi:10.5281/zenodo.6607553.443

Owner

  • Login: lasteine
  • Kind: user

Citation (CITATION.cff)

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this software, please cite it as below."
authors:
  - family-names: Steiner
    given-names: Ladina
    orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4958-0849
title: "Snow water equivalent estimation based on RTK-GNSS refractometry up-component bias, using Emlid Reach M2 .ENU baseline files"
version: 1.0
date-released: 2022-08-31

GitHub Events

Total
Last Year

Committers

Last synced: about 2 years ago

All Time
  • Total Commits: 17
  • Total Committers: 1
  • Avg Commits per committer: 17.0
  • Development Distribution Score (DDS): 0.0
Past Year
  • Commits: 1
  • Committers: 1
  • Avg Commits per committer: 1.0
  • Development Distribution Score (DDS): 0.0
Top Committers
Name Email Commits
lasteine 6****e 17

Issues and Pull Requests

Last synced: about 2 years ago

All Time
  • Total issues: 0
  • Total pull requests: 0
  • Average time to close issues: N/A
  • Average time to close pull requests: N/A
  • Total issue authors: 0
  • Total pull request authors: 0
  • Average comments per issue: 0
  • Average comments per pull request: 0
  • Merged pull requests: 0
  • Bot issues: 0
  • Bot pull requests: 0
Past Year
  • Issues: 0
  • Pull requests: 0
  • Average time to close issues: N/A
  • Average time to close pull requests: N/A
  • Issue authors: 0
  • Pull request authors: 0
  • Average comments per issue: 0
  • Average comments per pull request: 0
  • Merged pull requests: 0
  • Bot issues: 0
  • Bot pull requests: 0
Top Authors
Issue Authors
Pull Request Authors
Top Labels
Issue Labels
Pull Request Labels