competing-representations-shape-evidence-accumulation
Human and sim. behavioral / small-scale neural data for paper: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.10.03.510668v2
https://github.com/kalexandriabond/competing-representations-shape-evidence-accumulation
Science Score: 67.0%
This score indicates how likely this project is to be science-related based on various indicators:
-
✓CITATION.cff file
Found CITATION.cff file -
✓codemeta.json file
Found codemeta.json file -
✓.zenodo.json file
Found .zenodo.json file -
✓DOI references
Found 1 DOI reference(s) in README -
✓Academic publication links
Links to: biorxiv.org -
○Committers with academic emails
-
○Institutional organization owner
-
○JOSS paper metadata
-
○Scientific vocabulary similarity
Low similarity (5.0%) to scientific vocabulary
Keywords
Repository
Human and sim. behavioral / small-scale neural data for paper: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.10.03.510668v2
Basic Info
Statistics
- Stars: 1
- Watchers: 1
- Forks: 0
- Open Issues: 0
- Releases: 0
Topics
Metadata Files
README.md
Competing neural representations of choice shape evidence accumulation in humans
Making adaptive choices in dynamic environments requires flexible decision policies. Previously, we showed how shifts in outcome contingency change the evidence accumulation process that determines decision policies (1). Using in silico experiments to generate predictions, here we show how the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamic (CBGT) circuits can feasibly implement shifts in decision policies. When action contingencies change, dopaminergic plasticity redirects the balance of power, both within and between action representations, to divert the flow of evidence from one option to another. When competition between action representations is highest, the rate of evidence accumulation is lowest. This prediction was validated in in vivo experiments on human participants, using fMRI, which showed that 1) evoked hemodynamic responses can reliably predict trialwise choices and 2) competition between action representations, measured using a classifier model, tracked with changes in the rate of evidence accumulation. These results paint a holistic picture of how CBGT circuits manage and adapt the evidence accumulation process in mammals.
TLDR: Interactions between cortical and subcortical circuits in the mammalian brain flexibly control the flow of information streams that drive decisions by shifting the balance of power both within and between action representations.
See our OpenNeuro respository for raw and preprocessed hemodynamic and physiological data.
See the preprint here.
Owner
- Name: Alexandria Bond
- Login: kalexandriabond
- Kind: user
- Website: https://kalexandriabond.github.io/
- Repositories: 61
- Profile: https://github.com/kalexandriabond
computational cognitive neuroscience @ yale || information-seeker
Citation (CITATION.cff)
cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this software, please cite it as below." authors: - family-names: Bond given-names: Krista Alexandria Marie orcid: - family-names: Rasero given-names: Javier orcid: - family-names: Bahuguna given-names: Jyotika orcid: title: "Competing representations shape evidence accumulation" version: 2.0.4 doi: date-released: 2023-05-31 url: "https://github.com/kalexandriabond/competing-representations-shape-evidence-accumulation"
GitHub Events
Total
Last Year
Committers
Last synced: about 2 years ago
Top Committers
| Name | Commits | |
|---|---|---|
| K. Alexandria Bond | k****d@g****m | 22 |
| K. Alexandria Bond | k****d@g****m | 13 |
Issues and Pull Requests
Last synced: about 2 years ago
All Time
- Total issues: 0
- Total pull requests: 0
- Average time to close issues: N/A
- Average time to close pull requests: N/A
- Total issue authors: 0
- Total pull request authors: 0
- Average comments per issue: 0
- Average comments per pull request: 0
- Merged pull requests: 0
- Bot issues: 0
- Bot pull requests: 0
Past Year
- Issues: 0
- Pull requests: 0
- Average time to close issues: N/A
- Average time to close pull requests: N/A
- Issue authors: 0
- Pull request authors: 0
- Average comments per issue: 0
- Average comments per pull request: 0
- Merged pull requests: 0
- Bot issues: 0
- Bot pull requests: 0