precis-2-example

This repository contains an example of the comparison of two hypothetical trials in aging research, one of which is explanatory and the second of which is pragmatic in nature.

https://github.com/javimangal/precis-2-example

Science Score: 54.0%

This score indicates how likely this project is to be science-related based on various indicators:

  • CITATION.cff file
    Found CITATION.cff file
  • codemeta.json file
    Found codemeta.json file
  • .zenodo.json file
    Found .zenodo.json file
  • DOI references
  • Academic publication links
    Links to: preprints.org, mdpi.com
  • Academic email domains
  • Institutional organization owner
  • JOSS paper metadata
  • Scientific vocabulary similarity
    Low similarity (7.6%) to scientific vocabulary

Keywords

aging pragmatic-trials precis-2
Last synced: 6 months ago · JSON representation ·

Repository

This repository contains an example of the comparison of two hypothetical trials in aging research, one of which is explanatory and the second of which is pragmatic in nature.

Basic Info
  • Host: GitHub
  • Owner: javimangal
  • License: mit
  • Language: R
  • Default Branch: main
  • Homepage:
  • Size: 349 KB
Statistics
  • Stars: 0
  • Watchers: 1
  • Forks: 0
  • Open Issues: 0
  • Releases: 0
Topics
aging pragmatic-trials precis-2
Created almost 2 years ago · Last pushed over 1 year ago
Metadata Files
Readme License Citation

README.md

PRECIS-2 Example

Static Badge Static Badge

This repository contains an example of the comparison of two hypothetical trials in aging research, one of which is explanatory and the second of which is pragmatic in nature. This figure was used in the associated review article Statistical Considerations for the Design and Analysis of Pragmatic Trials in Aging Research.


PRECIS-2 score of 2 hypothetical trials

Usage

The code in the PRECIS-2.R script generates a comparative PRECIS-2 figure of two hypothetical trials. The scoring of PRECIS-2 elements for the two hypothetical trials was done according to the documentation in the PRECIS-2 website. You can find an explanation of our rationale for the scoring of these two hypothetical trials in the Rationale hypothetical trials document.

The packages-analysis-pragmatic-trials.docx contains a brief description of a selection of useful R packages for the analysis of pragmatic trials.

License

This project is licensed under the terms of the MIT License.

Owner

  • Name: Javier Mancilla Galindo
  • Login: javimangal
  • Kind: user
  • Location: Utrecht, Netherlands
  • Company: @UtrechtUniversity

Citation (CITATION.cff)

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this software, please cite it as below."
title: "Statistical considerations for the design and analysis of pragmatic trials in aging research"
authors:
  - family-names: Mancilla Galindo
    given-names: Javier
    orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0718-467X
version: 1.0.0
date-released: 2024-05-07
license: MIT
repository-code: "https://github.com/javimangal/PRECIS-2-example"
preferred-citation:
  type: article
  authors:
  - family-names: Kammar-García
    given-names: Ashuin
    orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3875-0945
  - family-names: Fernández-Urrutia
    given-names: Liliana Aline
    orcid: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9252-2636
  - family-names: Guevara-Díaz
    given-names: Jorge Alberto 
    orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9500-1780
  - family-names: Mancilla Galindo
    given-names: Javier
    orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0718-467X
  doi: "10.3390/geriatrics9030075"
  journal: "Geriatrics"
  month: 6
  start: 75 # First page number
  end: 75 # Last page number
  title: "Statistical Considerations for the Design and Analysis of Pragmatic Trials in Aging Research"
  issue: 3
  volume: 9
  year: 2024

GitHub Events

Total
Last Year

Issues and Pull Requests

Last synced: 11 months ago

All Time
  • Total issues: 0
  • Total pull requests: 0
  • Average time to close issues: N/A
  • Average time to close pull requests: N/A
  • Total issue authors: 0
  • Total pull request authors: 0
  • Average comments per issue: 0
  • Average comments per pull request: 0
  • Merged pull requests: 0
  • Bot issues: 0
  • Bot pull requests: 0
Past Year
  • Issues: 0
  • Pull requests: 0
  • Average time to close issues: N/A
  • Average time to close pull requests: N/A
  • Issue authors: 0
  • Pull request authors: 0
  • Average comments per issue: 0
  • Average comments per pull request: 0
  • Merged pull requests: 0
  • Bot issues: 0
  • Bot pull requests: 0
Top Authors
Issue Authors
Pull Request Authors
Top Labels
Issue Labels
Pull Request Labels