MSTest

This package implements hypothesis testing procedures that can be used to identify the number of regimes in a Markov switching model. It includes the Monte Carlo moment-based test of Dufour & Luger (2017), the parametric bootstrap test described in Qu & Zhuo (2021) and Kasahara & Shimotsu (2018), the Monte Carlo Likelihood ratio tests of Rodriguez-Rondon & Dufour (2023a), the optimal test for regime switching of Carrasco, Hu, & Ploberger (2014), and the likelihood ratio test described in Hansen (1992).

In addition to testing procedures, the package also includes datasets and functions that can be used to simulate: autoregressive, vector autoregressive, Markov switching autoregressive, and Markov switching vector autoregressive processes among others. Model estimation procedures are also available.

For a more detailed description of this package see Rodriguez-Rondon & Dufour (2023b).

Installation

To install the package, use the following line:

r install.packages("MSTest")

Load Package

Once package has been installed it can be loaded.

{r} library(MSTest)

Data

The MSTest package includes 3 datasets that can be used as examples. The three datasets are:

• hamilton84GNP: US GNP data from 1951Q2 - 1984Q4 used in Hamilton (1989) and Hansen (1992; 1996)
• chp10GNP: US GNP data from 1951Q2 - 2010Q4 used by Carrasco, Hu and Ploberger (2014)
• USGNP: US GNP data from 1947Q2 - 2022Q2 from FRED

They can be loaded using the following code. {r} GNPdata <- USGNP # this can be hamilton82GNP, chp10GNP or USGNP Y <- as.matrix(GNPdata$GNP_logdiff) date <- as.Date(GNPdata$DATE) plot(date,Y,xlab='Time',ylab='GNP - log difference',type = 'l')

You an also learn more about these datasets and their sources from their description in the help tab. {r} ?hamilton84GNP

Model Estimation & Process simulation

This first example uses the US GNP growth data from 1951Q2-1984Q4 considered in Hamilton (1989). The data is made available as 'hamilton84GNP' through this package. In Hamilton (1989), the model is estimated with four autoregressive lags and only the mean is allowed to change between two (i.e., expansionary and recessionary) regimes and it is estimated by MLE and so we begin by estimating that model. Estimation results can be compared with those found in Hamilton (1994) p. 698. Note however, that standard errors here were obtained using a different approximation method and hence these may differ slightly.

```r set.seed(123) # for initial values ygnpgw84 <- as.matrix(hamilton84GNP$GNPlogdiff)

Set options for model estimation

control <- list(msmu = TRUE, msvar = FALSE, method = "MLE", usediffinit = 5)

Estimate model with p=4 and switch in mean only as in Hamilton (1989)

hamilton89mdl <- MSARmdl(ygnpgw84, p = 4, k = 2, control) summary(hamilton89_mdl)

plot smoothed probability of recessionary state

plot(hamilton89_mdl) ```

This package also provides functions to simulate Markov switching processes among others. To do this, we use the 'simuMSAR' function to simulate a Markov switching process and then uses 'MSARmdl' to estimate the model. Estimated coefficients may be compared with the true parameters used to generate the data. A plot also shows the fit of the smoothed probabilities.

```r set.seed(123)

Define DGP of MS AR process

mdl_ms2 <- list(n = 500, mu = c(5,10), sigma = c(1,2), phi = c(0.5), k = 2, P = rbind(c(0.90, 0.10), c(0.10, 0.90)))

Simulate process using simuMSAR() function

ymssimu <- simuMSAR(mdl_ms2)

Set options for model estimation

control <- list(msmu = TRUE, msvar = TRUE, method = "EM", usediffinit = 10)

Estimate model

ymsmdl <- MSARmdl(ymssimu$y, p = 1, k = 2, control)

summary(ymsmdl)

plot(ymsmdl) ```

This third example, the 'simuMSVAR' function to simulate a bivariate Markov switching vector autoregressive process and then uses 'MSVARmdl' to estimate the model. Estimated coefficients may be compared with the true parameters used to generate the data. A plot also shows the fit of the smoothed probabilities.

```r set.seed(1234)

Define DGP of MS VAR process

mdl_msvar2 <- list(n = 1000, p = 1, q = 2, mu = rbind(c(5,-2), c(10,2)), sigma = list(rbind(c(5.0, 1.5), c(1.5, 1.0)), rbind(c(7.0, 3.0), c(3.0, 2.0))), phi = rbind(c(0.50, 0.30), c(0.20, 0.70)), k = 2, P = rbind(c(0.90, 0.10), c(0.10, 0.90)))

Simulate process using simuMSVAR() function

ymsvarsimu <- simuMSVAR(mdl_msvar2)

Set options for model estimation

control <- list(msmu = TRUE, msvar = TRUE, method = "EM", usediffinit = 10)

Estimate model

ymsvarmdl <- MSVARmdl(ymsvarsimu$y, p = 1, k = 2, control)

summary(ymsvarmdl)

plot(ymsvarmdl) ```

Hypothesis Testing

The main contribution of this r package is the hypothesis testing procedures it makes available.

Here we use The LMC-LRT procedure proposed in Rodriguez Rondon & Dufour (2022a; 2022b). ```r set.seed(123)

Define DGP of MS AR process

mdl_ms2 <- list(n = 500, mu = c(5,10), sigma = c(1,2), phi = c(0.5), k = 2, P = rbind(c(0.90, 0.10), c(0.10, 0.90)))

Simulate process using simuMSAR() function

ymssimu <- simuMSAR(mdl_ms2)

Set test procedure options

lmccontrol = list(N = 99, convergecheck = NULL, mdlh0control = list(const = TRUE, getSE = TRUE), mdlh1control = list(msmu = TRUE, msvar = TRUE, getSE = TRUE, method = "EM", maxit = 500, usediffinit = 1))

lmclrt <- LMCLRTest(ymssimu$y, p = 1 , k0 = 1 , k1 = 2, lmccontrol) summary(lmc_lrt) ```

We can also use the moment-based test procedure proposed by Dufour & Luger (2017)

```r set.seed(123)

Set test procedure options

lmccontrol = list(N = 99, simdistN = 10000, getSE = TRUE)

perform test on Hamilton 1989 data

lmcmb <- DLMCTest(ymssimu$y, p = 1, control = lmccontrol) summary(lmc_mb) ```

The package also makes available the Maximized Monte Carlo versions of both these tests and the standardized likelihood ratio test proposed by Hansen (1992) (see HLRTest()) and the parameter stability test of Carrasco, Hu, & Ploberger (2014) (see CHPTest()).

References

Carrasco, Marine, Liang Hu, and Werner Ploberger. (2014). Optimal test for Markov switching parameters, Econometrica, 82 (2): 765–784. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA8609

Dempster, A. P., N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin. (1977). Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 39 (1): 1–38.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x

Dufour, Jean-Marie, and Richard Luger. (2017). Identification-robust moment-based tests for Markov switching in autoregressive models, Econometric Reviews 36 (6-9): 713–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2017.1307548

Kasahara, Hiroyuk, and Katsum Shimotsu. (2018). Testing the number of regimes in Markov regime switching models, arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.06862.

Krolzig, Hans-Martin. (1997). The Markov-Switching Vector Autoregressive Model. In: Markov-Switching Vector Autoregressions. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer, vol 454. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51684-9_2

Hamilton, James D. (1989). A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle, Econometrica 57 (2): 357–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912559

Hamilton, James D. (1994). Time series analysis, Princeton university press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv14jx6sm

Hansen, Bruce E. (1992). The likelihood ratio test under nonstandard conditions: testing the Markov switching model of GNP, Journal of applied Econometrics 7 (S1): S61–S82. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.3950070506

Rodriguez-Rondon, Gabriel and Jean-Marie Dufour (2022). Simulation-Based Inference for Markov Switching Models, JSM Proceedings, Business and Economic Statistics Section: American Statistical Association.

Rodriguez-Rondon, Gabriel and Jean-Marie Dufour (2024a). Monte Carlo Likelihood Ratio Tests for Markov Switching Models, Manuscript, McGill University Economics Department.

Rodriguez-Rondon, Gabriel and Jean-Marie Dufour. (2024b). MSTest: An R-package for Testing Markov-Switching Models, Manuscript, McGill University Economics Department.

Qu, Zhongjun, and Fan Zhuo. (2021). Likelihood Ratio-Based Tests for Markov Regime Switching, The Review of Economic Studies 88 (2): 937–968. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdaa035